Big Fanboy posted a review Scott Kurtz called "honest." While I won't necessarily disagree with the adjective, I will say "stilted" applies more. For someone who complains about scenes being removed (may very well be a valid complaint, I'll let you know at about 3AM-ish on May 19th, that'll be 1AM for you Utahns) he certainly seemed to excise some random sentences from his review.
A couple of the complaints sound like fanboy whining forgetting what the series is about. For example, he complains of some limited random goofiness, but I'm not sure what else he thought lines like "I don't care what you smell, get down there" and "Everything's fine here. We're all fine here. How are you?" were. a little bit of goofiness is to be expected and enjoyed with these films. Just not omnipresent.
But then, some of the compliments were also fanboyish, such as R2's parts being "very cool." So perhaps honest was a good adjective for the review. You discount the blatant fanboy speak (it IS "bigfanboy.com" afterall) and you still have a positive review that keeps from gushing and admits to the lacking pieces.
I'm still incredibly psyched. Less than 206 hours...
