856
Books / Re: A business question about publishing…
« on: February 19, 2009, 09:38:51 PM »
apart from the certainties in Ookla's post, my personal opinion is that it would be dumb of an author to sign ONE deal for that many novels. I don't even think Jordan did that, Goodkind didn't, Brooks didn't Eddings didn't, Martin didn't (i dont think). The only person i know of that DID was Erikson in the UK...and he made a KILLING.
The simple idea behind this is that as you write more, your popularity grows, as does your monetary worth. For example, Brandon makes far more per book now than his prior contracts. Why do 1 contract for ten books at a lower price when you can do a few contracts of 3 books each that increase each time?
From here, you could argue that filler novels are better for an immediate money maker - long term, not so much. I mean, this is Goodkind in a nutshell yeah?
The simple idea behind this is that as you write more, your popularity grows, as does your monetary worth. For example, Brandon makes far more per book now than his prior contracts. Why do 1 contract for ten books at a lower price when you can do a few contracts of 3 books each that increase each time?
From here, you could argue that filler novels are better for an immediate money maker - long term, not so much. I mean, this is Goodkind in a nutshell yeah?