Your writing is pretty clean for the most part, but it's a bit bogged down by adjectives (particularly attached to dialogue tags) and by description in general, I find. I think that the reason I feel that there's a lot of it is that you stop to describe basically every new character and every new setting. While it's good to know what people and things look like, and while on their own these are all relatively short descriptions, it adds up pretty quickly, and it also starts to feel formulaic.
There are places where I think that the characterization works really well, and I've tagged some of them in my line edits, but overall I'm finding the emotion... not bad, not flat, but a little bit superficial. I think you can delve deeper. And I do think there is interesting stuff here to delve.
The prologue feels more like a set of previews you'd see just before the start of a TV episode or something than a prologue to a novel. You know, "Coming up on CSI" or something. The prologue doesn't have to showcase every plot arch in the novel, or even most of them. I don't feel like I have anything to sink my teeth into here. If I knew more about one of the situations you were throwing at us here I might be more interested.
It could just be that there's information that I'm not privvy to, but for someone who's supposed to be graded on his thesis the next day, and who is not satisfied with the results, Adam seems awfully casual about it.
Is it plausible for sand dunes to form inside a walled city?
I would have liked to be introduced to the actual conflict of Eshra's scene a bit sooner.
When Trinian started using Eshra's first name I thought that he was more than just a bodyguard (not necessarily a lover, but someone who knew her very well, at least) and was interested, but it seems that he's just impertinent hired muscle. Ah well. That still tells us something about him, I suppose.
Trinian, so convinced that the Queen (or whoever) would help Eshra, seems a bit naive.
Okay, again getting the impression that Eshra and Trinian know each other quite well. All's well, moving on.
At first I assumed that Adam was another of Eshra's bodyguards. Eshra seemed to lump him together with Trinian, and they're both Auroks, so I jumped to a conclusion. found it a little bit jarring. Because I figured that Adam was Eshra's bodyguard, I thought that there was a fairly significant time gap between Adam's scene and the scene that I'm reading now, and I couldn't see any reason for said gap. Maybe I was making weird assumptions, and nobody else will think this was a problem. But was a bit off-put until I realized that Adam was still at the university, and there's a fairly long period between when Adam is first mentioned and when it's revealed that he's still at the university, so I've had almost a page to puzzle over it.
If Felix suspects the Magistrate, why doesn't it occur to Eshra that Felix might help her?
The Queen's entrance is one place where I think that stopping to describe a character's appearance actually works really well--or at least, that it COULD work well. It makes sense because she’s entering the room, and because as royalty, she’s likely to be the center of attention when she is present. So description like this not only lets us know what the character looks like, it places emphasis on her entrance. It loses its impact, though, because you do it so often.
At first, with all that about the isolated Queen and the way Eshra discussed the Senate and the Magistrate and all the powerful figures of the kingdom (or so she made it seem) but the Queen, I assumed that the Queen was, at best, a disinterested ruler, and probably a puppet. I see now that this isn't the case. Good job on subverting my expectations here.
Saraneth strikes me as a bit of a whiner. She seems to start a lot of her sentences with "But, Majesty!" That's fine if this is what you intend, though I do wonder why the Queen lets her get away with it. Then again, it does seem that they know each other well enough that their relationship might bear this out. I'll wait and see, I guess.
Now Tristan is but-majesty-ing too! Augh!
Oh, wait. The Queen is taking them to task for it. Good. Nevermind.
The latter half of this scene, when the Queen switches from talking about the current problem--Eshra--to this miscellaneous other stuff, feels extraneous. That is, it feels like a way to introduce us to all of these other conflicts in the kingdom, even though (as far as I can tell) they have little to do with the situation at hand. It has a plausible segue, but that's about it. If it's really important that this information come out (and come out right now) reframing some of it in terms of "how this other stuff effects/is affected by this Eshra problem" might make it feel a bit less infodumpy.
I have no idea why Tristan and Gareth are giving Felix "knowing" looks, or what Felix is being "judged" for. Of course, I don't necessarily need to know right this second, but a little more information here might be nice.
Oh, here it is. This could potentially be a very interesting conflict for Felix. You don't have to reveal it before you do, but I would really like to see this dynamic played out in the earlier conversation. I had no idea that Tristan and Gareth "judged" Felix for his relationship with the Queen until their "knowing looks," and I had no idea the Queen and Felix were lovers until you told me. All of this ought to have a huge effect on how these characters interact with each other, and I think you can bring it out much more.
Some responses to what others have said...
I'm not sure that the three POVs in one chapter is "too many" all on its own. If you're planning on introducing three POVs in EVERY chapter then yes, that might be a bit of a problem.
But it's not always a bad thing.
Here, I do think that it does become a bit of a problem. Specifically, I'm kind of wondering what Adam's scene is doing in this chapter. As an introduction to his character it works just fine, but it doesn't really accomplish much other than that. (Which is--again--not
necessarily a bad thing all on its own. Like I said, as an introductin to Adam it's fine.) So Adam's scene really stands out in comparison to the other two scenes, which are both focused on the same problem. Adam is only mentioned once, tangentially, so if you're worried about us knowing who he is, well, I don't think we need to know this early.
I have to agree with Asmodemon is right that there's a lot of explanatory setting stuff going on at the expense of character development. At least, it feels like you're focused on getting as much information out as you possibly can, and while it's great that that information is there, we don't need to know it all at once. So: Less about the world, more about the characters. I think all of your characters have some interesting conflicts going on, and I want to see more of that in their words and their actions.
Asmodemon makes an interesting point about undermining the feel of danger/tension that we have for Eshra, but I honestly can't decide whether I think it's a problem. Do with that what you will.
Breaking each viewpoint into seperate chapters might become artificial and cumbersome. I don't know if this helps, but I think of my chapters as units. Each one focuses on a particular problem. The end of the chapter comes when that problem is--not resolved, necessarily, but dealt with in some way. So I don't fuss particularly about the length of the chapter or the number of viewpoints or anything like that. I just make sure that every POV/scene/what have you is contributing to the chapter's central conflict. I think that the problem Asmodemon has identified with too many viewpoints actually has to do with the fact that Adam's chapter, as I've already mentioned, doesn't seem to fit with the conflict of the rest of the chapter.
Of course, I say all that like I actually know what I'm talking about. This is just one person's opinion.
I think paring down the information that you're giving comes down to two things. One is what I was just talking about, which is relevance. Reveal information as it becomes necessary to understand the problems at hand and not all the problems down the road. The other, as Asmodemon's already said, is the age old "show don't tell."
Oh, I did notice the similarity between "Trinian" and "Trinar." I didn't personally have a problem with it, but I can see how it might trip readers up. I never got the impression that the Queen was evil, by the way. Actually, the bit about her locking her up in her tower made me think that she was a puppet ruler.
Okay, wow. Sorry about the long and disjointed critique. Hopefully it's at least SOMEWHAT helpful.