You did indeed
I'll start with the good. You do a superb job of describing clothing. The first two pages were really, really good. You were describing the clothing, and it led perfectly into Theodora's conflict. It actually
worked for me that you were describing clothing. You probably don't think that's much of a praise, but really, from me, it is.
I'm also interested in your world. The politics are fascinating. It excuses the piece for not really having any "fantasy" elements to it. There's no magic or elements that make this world foreign, but the interesting culture were sufficient at this point, at least.
So overall, the prose is pretty good. There were two viewpoint errors I saw early on, which I'll mention later.
And now for the bad: it is excruciatingly telly. I forgave you on the first two pages. It was an interesting interlude until we sorta understood Theodora on page two, with her primary conflict. Then we get exposition about the Interlude, the court system, Justiciars... It goes on and on. When I finished the piece, I did have a good impression of the politics, but it would have been so much better if I had been shown it!
I
know there's good story hiding away in this piece somewhere. But that's not what I was reading. I was reading almost an encyclopedia. Cut all the unnecessary exposition paragraphs and just get me to the scene and the story. We had a cool conflict with Theodora, but you didn't capitalize on it. We had an accused criminal was hacked down by a Justicar--that scene, if you had shown it, would have made the chapter worth it completely. There's a King who obviously has a fairly free sex life, and this should have been capitalized on more, too.
There's interesting stuff happening. That's what I want to see! I mean, come on. We have a Kingdom which has a strong focus on art, and it's a democracy. You almost have the impression that this is almost a utopia. Then we see the judicial system is essentially a barbaric gladiatorial contest! That's an
excellent juxtaposition that you can easily capitalize on.
So really, my issue is that there's not enough story.
Line issues:
Queen Elmina caught Theodora glancing in her direction, and they exchanged vibrant smiles.
The way its phrased has Elmina as a viewpoint character. It's not hard to shift the phrases around to make it Theodora's, however.
This one is much more egregious, however:
The Queen eyed her suspiciously, wary that her protruding knee would attract the eyes of her husband.
That's a line I would expect from an Elmina viewpoint.
When we get to Thomas's introduction, the prose isn't crystal clear that the "slight man" is in fact the King. The way it is phrased, it is just some guy, and his name is introduced later. It would flow better by just stating who he is so there's no confusion.
That's all the line issues. Your prose is solid, but then again, it's hard to judge because there wasn't much actual meat to the story.