I guess we should try this method of submitting a few more times, but I am not sure it's actually working all that well. This round of submissions, seven people submitted. The number of critiques on each manuscript ranged from 2-5, and total posts from 4-7. That is a significant drop from the round before, when it looks like around 10 people submitted and the number of total replies ranged from 14-20.
This week, so far only 2 people have said they plan to submit. It doesn't take rocket science to guess that they won't get a whole lot of critiques...
Also, its impossible to tell whether some of those not critiquing are not reading, as well. When they do try to critique later on, their ability to make informed observations is limited, because they won't know what is going on in the story.
Basically my point is, we need a way to up the number of critiques. Whether we do that by finding a way to up the number of submissions, or by simply getting more people to write down their thoughts even when it isn't their turn to critique, I don't know. I'm not offering a plan right now, just pointing out we might need one.