Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Eric James Stone

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35]
Everything Else / Re: Riddles
« on: September 10, 2005, 03:00:10 PM »
Legion, you're not alone.  The first time I heard the puzzle it took me quite a while to understand why it paid to switch.

Everything Else / Re: Riddles
« on: September 10, 2005, 02:58:37 PM »
You and two other very smart people were brought before the President.  He want's to see which of you is the smartest, so you can figure out how to lower gas prices.  

You are led blind-folded into a small room, and seated around a table.  The president describes the test.

"Upon each of your heads I have placed a hat. You are either wearing a blue hat or a white hat. You don't know which, but I will tell you this; at least one of you is wearing a blue hat. There may be only one blue hat and two white hats, there may be two blue hats and one white hat, or there may be three blue hats. But you may be certain that there are not three white hats."

The president explains that when the blindfolds are taken off, the first to correctly announce the color of his hat shall be his advisor.  

With that, the president uncovers your eyes and you see that your two competitors are each wearing blue hats. You see from the look in their eyes that they are thinking, "What is the color of my hat?"

For hours nobody speaks, then finally you stand up and say, "The color of the hat I am wearing is..."  

What color is your hat?  And how do you come to that conclusiong?

My hat is blue and here's why:

There are three possible configurations of what each of the three contestants could see.

1. 2 white hats.  If you see this, you would know instantly that you had a blue hat, because there cannot be more than two white hats, so you would announce the answer and win the contest.  Since someone did not do this, we know nobody saw this configuration.

2. 1 blue, 1 white.  If you see this, then you have to ask yourself what color your own hat is.  If it were white, then the guy in the blue hat would see configuration #1, and so he would announce his answer and win the contest.  Since he doesn't do that, your hat must be blue.  So you would announce the answer and win the contest.   Since someone did not do this, we know nobody saw this configuration.

3. 2 blue.  If you see this, then you have to ask yourself what color your own hat is. If it were white, then the other two contestants would see configuration #2, and  one of them would announce the answer and win the contest.  Since neither of them do that, you know your hat must be blue.

Since I see two blue hats, if my hat were white, then one of the other two very smart people would have already won this contest, instead of us sitting around here for hours.  So my hat must be blue.

Everything Else / Re: Riddles
« on: September 10, 2005, 12:44:12 PM »
I know the hat one because I've heard it before.  Am I allowed to answer?

Everything Else / Re: Riddles
« on: September 09, 2005, 07:21:45 PM »
This does not chance the fact that the question still leaves you with only 2 choices.

The fact that there are two choices does not automatically mean the probability of each choice being a winner is the same.

Assume that after you have chosen box A, the host gives you the following 2 choices:

1. Stick with box A.
2. Choose both B and C.  If a prize is in either one, you win.

So you have only two choices, but that doesn't mean the probability of the prize being in A has suddenly jumped from 33% to 50%.  With choice 1, your probability of winning is only 33%; with choice 2, it is 67%.

When the host eliminates one box, he is really still giving you choice 2.  Since at least one box out of B and C must be empty, the fact that the host shows you that one of them is empty does not change the fact that there was a 67% chance the prize would be in either B or C.

Let's make it even more clear.

The host shows you 1,000,000 boxes, and tells you that there is a prize hidden in just one of the boxes.  You choose box 234,567.  What are the chances you selected the box with the prize? One in a million (0.0001%).

Now the host has his assistants open up 999,998 of the boxes, showing them as empty.  Only your box and box 327,649 are left.

You have only two choices, now.  Do you seriously believe that the probability that you picked the right box has jumped from 0.0001% to 50%, merely because all the other boxes have been eliminated?

Everything Else / Re: Riddles
« on: September 09, 2005, 03:46:45 PM »
Formula is now

A = still your pick
B=another box
C = been eliminated so its zero now

A + (B + 0) = 100% chance of that right?

So then it's really A + B = 100% chance of winning...2 choices both equal it’s a 50/50 chance that either is true...

Can you show me anything that is wrong with this logic?

Yes, your logic makes the false assumption that the two choices are equal. That is not the case, because your choice was made randomly, while the host's choice is made knowingly.

When you picked A, there was a 1 in 3 chance that it was correct.  Since you have no way of knowing which box contains the prize, your choice is random.

Now, when the host eliminates one of the two remaining boxes, he is not acting randomly.  If he were acting randomly, then there would be a 1/3 chance he would eliminate the box with the prize.  But since he can only eliminate a box that does not have the prize, that means he does not affect the original probability of 2/3 that the prize is not in box A.  Which means there is a 2/3 chance the prize is in the box the host did not eliminate.

Everything Else / Re: Cascadiacon & et. al.
« on: September 08, 2005, 08:53:29 PM »

Site News / Re: Introduce yourself - right on!
« on: September 08, 2005, 01:20:50 PM »
My name's Eric James Stone.  I live in Eagle Mountain, Utah (west of Lehi).

I got my PoliSci degree from BYU and my law degree from Baylor.  So, naturally, I'm working as a web developer for an Internet company.

That's my day job.  By night, I write science fiction and fantasy.  I've had a few short stories published, and I recently completed a fantasy novel, though it still needs some revision before I send it out.

Brandon Sanderson / Re: Second Printing
« on: September 08, 2005, 01:12:38 PM »
I'm sorry, we can't have two Eric's here, it's far too confusing.

Feel free to call me EJS -- that's what the Hatrack Writers usually do.

::waves to Brandon's groupies posse::

Brandon Sanderson / Re: Second Printing
« on: September 07, 2005, 06:13:05 PM »
Well, I'm sure they wouldn't be going to a third printing if they thought they were going to get a lot of returns off the first printing.

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35]