Author Topic: article: Little Girls  (Read 6689 times)

Entsuropi

  • Level 60
  • *
  • Posts: 5033
  • Fell Points: 0
  • =^_^= Captain of the highschool Daydreaming team
    • View Profile
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #45 on: February 23, 2006, 12:38:09 PM »
I refer to some people as 'boy'. Even when they are, infact, older than me. Don't read too much into it.
If you're ever in an argument and Entropy winds up looking staid and temperate in comparison, it might be time to cut your losses and start a new thread about something else :)

Fellfrosch

Nessa

  • Administrator
  • Level 32
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
  • Fell Points: 5
  • Giving life to demon spawn since 1999
    • View Profile
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #46 on: February 23, 2006, 12:54:49 PM »
Quote
I refer to some people as 'boy'. Even when they are, infact, older than me. Don't read too much into it.

As an endearment? When I imagine you calling someone older than you 'boy' it would be more sarcastic or joking.
"The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter--'tis the difference between the lightning-bug and the lightning."  -  Mark Twain

Check out my book reviews at http://elitistbookreviews.blogspot.com/

JenaRey

  • Level 7
  • ****
  • Posts: 233
  • Fell Points: 0
  • Give me chocolate...or. ..there is no or.  Gi
    • View Profile
    • Reality By Pass
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #47 on: February 23, 2006, 01:17:17 PM »
e - I'm sure my niece would be thrilled to know she was quoted, except that at five she's not sure what quoted means or why I find her hysterical.

As far as the definitions of becoming a 'man' or a 'woman' a lot of that is societally based on the assumption of specific responsibilities, and also comparison in ages and association.  I will always be my mother's baby, even though I've not been near the baby stage for a long time, and my grandfather's best girl.  Those are uses of the words as terms of affection and familial endearment, so as brought up here I think the usage of the word boy or girl is very much changed by situation and who is speaking it and it not always a definition of maturity.  It can be meant that way, but it's layers of interrelated meaning that means more to gender than age.  Along those lines you can get even more complex and look at societies such as the Thai where there are FIVE separate genders.  I think I'll stick with my niece.  ;)

~J
http://realitybypass.8m.com

You know you wanna...

Fellfrosch

  • Administrator
  • Level 68
  • *
  • Posts: 7033
  • Fell Points: 42
  • Walkin' with a dead man over my shoulder.
    • View Profile
    • Fearful Symmetry
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #48 on: February 23, 2006, 01:27:20 PM »
I call my daughter "baby girl," which really bugged her for a while--between 18 and 30 months old, when she was old enough to not be a baby yet still young enough to make it a fine line (and a very important one in her mind). She insisted that she was a big girl. Now that she's four, she doesn't mind being called baby girl because she knows she's not a baby, and she knows I don't think she's a baby. She's confident in her big girl-ness, I guess, and appreciates her nickname for the term of endearment that it is.
"Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you walk into an open sewer and die." --Mel Brooks

My author website: http://www.fearfulsymmetry.net

The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers

  • Administrator
  • Level 96
  • *****
  • Posts: 19211
  • Fell Points: 17
  • monkeys? yes.
    • View Profile
    • herb's world
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #49 on: February 23, 2006, 01:38:43 PM »
for some reason, I call my 2 year old "Pooks"

She tells me "No. I'm not pooks. I'm Phoebe."

Her name is Rachael.

/me shakes his fist at The Magic School Bus

House of Mustard

  • Level 44
  • *
  • Posts: 2934
  • Fell Points: 3
  • Firstborn Unicorn
    • View Profile
    • robisonwells.com
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #50 on: February 23, 2006, 05:46:54 PM »
Quote

 Along those lines you can get even more complex and look at societies such as the Thai where there are FIVE separate genders.  I think I'll stick with my niece.


Now I'm curious: what are the five?
I got soul, but I'm not a soldier.

www.robisonwells.com

stacer

  • Level 58
  • *
  • Posts: 4641
  • Fell Points: 0
    • View Profile
    • Stacy Whitman's Grimoire
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #51 on: February 23, 2006, 05:52:49 PM »
Sounds like something in Hinduism, where an ancient sect believes that homosexuals are a separate gender, from what I could tell from an NPR piece I listened to once.
Help start a small press dedicated to publishing multicultural fantasy and science fiction for children and young adults. http://preview.tinyurl.com/pzojaf.

Follow our blog at http://www.tupublishing.com
We're on Twitter, too! http://www.twitter.com/tupublishing

JenaRey

  • Level 7
  • ****
  • Posts: 233
  • Fell Points: 0
  • Give me chocolate...or. ..there is no or.  Gi
    • View Profile
    • Reality By Pass
Re: article: Little Girls
« Reply #52 on: February 23, 2006, 06:15:23 PM »
Male
Female
Dee or Tom - lesbian/dominant female
seaubai - gay/subdominant male
Kathoey - transgendered/transsexual/hermaphroditic/neutral

The ancient Thai legend says that First Man and First Woman were created, and then First Kathoey.  Man and woman were to be the beings of creation and continuation of the species and kathoey to bridge the gap between.

I don't know enough about it to get into a lot of details.  A good friend of mine did her doctorate disertation on the subject, which is where I learned about it.

~J
http://realitybypass.8m.com

You know you wanna...