136
Books / Re: So did you hear about Chris Paolini's books?
« on: February 07, 2008, 07:59:02 PM »
I really enjoyed these books and have been anxiously awaiting the 3rd. Now that I also get a 4th, I am a little excited, but am disappointed I have to wait so long.
One thing I don't understand, is why these books bring so much negativity. I don't really think that's the case. I think if you look hard enough for a reason to dislike something, you can find it. I read all the reviews on amazon saying this is just like star wars and LotR. I honestly didn't find it that way.
All stories are complex enough, that if you really look into them you can compare them to just about anything. Especially if you are looking at things in the same genre. There is an entire website dedicated to trashing on these books.
IMO, if you don't like them, don't read them. What makes people think they need to go on some kind of crusade to prevent other people from reading them?
There was one comment about the horses in these books, and how there was one seen where Eragon was riding through the desert pushing the horse to the limit. They said that he obviously doesn't know anything about horses, and they easily would of died being pushed this hard.
Well... this is fantasy. It's his world. Maybe in his world the horses can do that. If this kind of factual issue bugs you, don't read it, but there's no reason to start a war against it.
You could do this for pretty much any book. I could say (though I never would) that Brandon's books are completely not worth reading, because Mistborns and allomancers are just Jedi's in different clothing. Elantris is completely unoriginal because we already read the story of the Elantrians in The Giving Tree. Alcatraz is just a cross between Dr. Seus and Harry Potter.
Enough books have been written that you can find another book that you can compare part of another too. That doesn't make it bad. So what if authors were inspired by something. If someone is able to look past that and enjoy the story, great. If other people can't. Great. I just don't see the point in trying to press that viewpoint on others.
/rant
One thing I don't understand, is why these books bring so much negativity. I don't really think that's the case. I think if you look hard enough for a reason to dislike something, you can find it. I read all the reviews on amazon saying this is just like star wars and LotR. I honestly didn't find it that way.
All stories are complex enough, that if you really look into them you can compare them to just about anything. Especially if you are looking at things in the same genre. There is an entire website dedicated to trashing on these books.
IMO, if you don't like them, don't read them. What makes people think they need to go on some kind of crusade to prevent other people from reading them?
There was one comment about the horses in these books, and how there was one seen where Eragon was riding through the desert pushing the horse to the limit. They said that he obviously doesn't know anything about horses, and they easily would of died being pushed this hard.
Well... this is fantasy. It's his world. Maybe in his world the horses can do that. If this kind of factual issue bugs you, don't read it, but there's no reason to start a war against it.
You could do this for pretty much any book. I could say (though I never would) that Brandon's books are completely not worth reading, because Mistborns and allomancers are just Jedi's in different clothing. Elantris is completely unoriginal because we already read the story of the Elantrians in The Giving Tree. Alcatraz is just a cross between Dr. Seus and Harry Potter.
Enough books have been written that you can find another book that you can compare part of another too. That doesn't make it bad. So what if authors were inspired by something. If someone is able to look past that and enjoy the story, great. If other people can't. Great. I just don't see the point in trying to press that viewpoint on others.
/rant