Author Topic: review: Inside Man  (Read 1598 times)


Paul_Gibbs

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 55
  • Fell Points: 1
  • Scorcese in '07
    • View Profile
    • www.laughingstock.us
Re: review: Inside Man
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2006, 06:42:40 PM »
There is a mistake in the headline here, which is perfectly understandable. The word "jaunt" should read "joint". Spike, eccentric that he is, bills his films as "A Spike Lee Joint" rather than "A Spike Lee Film" (he insists this is not a drug reference, but rather a reference to his club, "Spike's Joint"). Even "Inside Man", certainly the most fun movie movie Spike has made, doesn't quite qualify as a "jaunt." Again, the mistake is 100% understandable: Why would anyone call a movie a "joint"?
"So long, and thanks for all the fish."

Skar

  • Moderator
  • Level 54
  • *
  • Posts: 3979
  • Fell Points: 7
    • View Profile
Re: review: Inside Man
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2006, 06:52:19 PM »
Sorry about that.  I did in fact change it after I thought to myself, "Why would anyone call a movie a joint?"  It is fixed now.
"Skar is the kind of bird who, when you try to kill him with a stone, uses it, and the other bird, to take vengeance on you in a swirling melee of death."

-Fellfrosch

Paul_Gibbs

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 55
  • Fell Points: 1
  • Scorcese in '07
    • View Profile
    • www.laughingstock.us
Re: review: Inside Man
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2006, 10:34:29 PM »
Quote
Sorry about that.  I did in fact change it after I thought to myself, "Why would anyone call a movie a joint?"  It is fixed now.


As I said, perfectly understandable. Spike is a. . . unique guy.
"So long, and thanks for all the fish."