Isocracy is very similar to anarchism, if not identical. I have recently come to prefer the term because it lacks the negative connatations of anarchy. Yes, there are subtle differences, but on the whole a isocratic society would be very similar to an anarchistic one. I mean, in ana narchy you have no government, but a truly representative democracy could be considered isocracy, but face it, an anarchy will still have leadership roles, but they will be leading not through power but through the people having respect for the leaders good decisions.
Think of open source software development. Some people are going to take charge, but if they don't do it well, the people will just leave and go and work on it themselves.
The reason I use this symbol is because the anarchy sign, already cool looking, is merged with a power on sign. The whole thought of digital anarchy or anarchy through tech appeals to me.
Should I mention now that Australias taxes aren't that much higher than the US, yet we offer government supported healthcare to anyone who chooses not to or can't afford private healthcare? Apart from some isolated incidents that were very bad, it is good - the main difference is smaller rooms in hospitals, less luxary, you can't choose your own doctor but get assigned one etc. You'll still get the treatment you need. Plus, no 40% increases in tax that I've noticed.