Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Skar

Pages: 1 ... 125 126 [127] 128
1891
Site News / Re: Another Call for Articles
« on: October 07, 2004, 03:10:03 PM »
 Ok. I just reread my review of equilibrium and whoever edited it screwed it up mildly. What I submitted read:  

"The leaders reason that sacrificing love and joy is a small price to pay for ridding themselves of hate and anger."

What it says now is:  

"The leaders' reason is that sacrificing love and joy is a small price to pay for ridding themselves of hate and anger."

In my version "reason" is used as a verb.  Perhaps it's not as clear as it could be but I like my version better since the edited version has no clear antecedent.

Could it be corrected please?

1892
Movies and TV / Re: review: Equilibrium
« on: October 07, 2004, 03:04:51 PM »
Sigh...  "leaders" is spelled with an apostrophe on the end in the edited version, not a string of nonsense characters.

1893
Movies and TV / Re: review: Equilibrium
« on: October 07, 2004, 03:03:23 PM »
Ok. I just reread my review of equilibrium and whoever edited it screwed it up mildly. What I submitted read:

"The leaders reason that sacrificing love and joy is a small price to pay for ridding themselves of hate and anger."

What it says now is:

"The leaders’ reason is that sacrificing love and joy is a small price to pay for ridding themselves of hate and anger."

In my version "reason" is used as a verb.  Perhaps it's not as clear as it could be but at least it doesn't read like a twelve year old wrote it, with no clear antecedent.

Could it be corrected please?

1894
Rants and Stuff / Re: Word Nonsense
« on: October 06, 2004, 11:45:10 AM »
OK, now I'm pissed off.  Journeyman Ditchdigger?  I want to change classes.  How do I do that?

1895
Rants and Stuff / Re: Word Nonsense
« on: October 06, 2004, 11:44:29 AM »
Sand

1896
Movies and TV / Re: review: Equilibrium
« on: October 06, 2004, 11:40:20 AM »
Excellent!  Another Equilibrium fan!  Had you seen it before I reviewed it?  I must know, I must!

1897
Movies and TV / Re: review: Equilibrium
« on: October 05, 2004, 05:26:39 PM »
Yup, a long time ago. If I remember, at the end the main character commits suicide by sledding down a long hill while imagining that good things are happening. Am I remembering the right book?

1898
Movies and TV / Re: review: Equilibrium
« on: October 05, 2004, 12:57:27 PM »
Of course not.  Do you challenge the fact (well-known) that movie reviews are perfectly objective and based on a rational scientific formula?  Much like the explication of literature, differences arise only through a lack of mathematical ability on the part of the different explicators.  If the formula were proplerly applied in all cases movie reviews would be perfect copies of one another.

Thank heavens for pig-ignorant philistines who can't do math. :D  My version is, of course, the correct one.  

I have heard that Ninja-monkeys are particularly sensitive to faulty movie review work.  Perhaps this is why you don't review many movies?

1899
Movies and TV / Re: review: Equilibrium
« on: October 05, 2004, 11:47:22 AM »
I just cruised past Rottentomatoes.com, (at entropy's tacit suggestion) something I didn't do before I wrote the review.  From reading the blurbs it's pretty obvious that most of the reviewers, if not all, just didn't get the movie.

Reason must triumph over emotion.  How often must we, as a society, be reminded of this?  

Equilibrium graphically presents the case for both sides of the question: Which should rule, heart or mind?  The answer, of course, is a balance of both.  In today's press and in most of my discussions with people over events in the world, emotion rules supreme.  Arguments that produce a warm fuzzy get dressed up in pseudo-intellectual nonsense that sounds reasonable but when carried to a logical conclusion is revealed as silly.  Equilibrium shows the system out of whack in the other direction but does not present our extreme as the answer either.  It draws a solid conclusion right smack in the middle of the road where it belongs, emotion informing but ruled by reason.

My favorite moment from this movie is when Preston is taking the polygraph and has been revealed as a wildly frightened sense offender.  When he reaches the conclusion that he really is going to have to fight his way in and kill "Father" the polygraph demonstrates his decision and the polygraph-reader understands.  Mayhem follows.  Choice!

The reviewers on Rottentomatoes are all pig ignorant philistines.

1900
Site News / Re: Introduce yourself - right on!
« on: October 04, 2004, 05:59:05 PM »
Yeah.  I'm Ethan Skarstedt.  In a former life I got a degree in English from BYU where I met everyone at TLE.  One year I was the grandmaster-committe-meister-chair of LTUE.  It was so fun that I have never returned to even a single meeting of the committee.

I have been published in Sunstone as the third place winner of the Brookie and DK Brown fiction contest.  Other than that zilch except for some drawings I did for TLE.  Which don't count because I worked there.

Now I work as a Graphic Designer for the marketing department of a hearing aid company.

Currently I'm working on a book about my experiences in Afghanistan.  When that's done I'll go back to work on my Science Fiction novel and various short stories.

1901
Site News / Re: The Return of Skar
« on: October 04, 2004, 11:42:25 AM »
Hey folks.  Thanks for all the thanks.  It's good to be back and especially good to be reminded that y'all remember who I am after so much time away!

My wife and I would love to get together with everyone some evening.  Buca di Beppo sounds like a great place to go.

As for the lasertag thing, it sounds as fun as it did before I left.

A game night would also be mega cool.  All my magic cards are at least two years old and there's no one to play with up here so... just about any game sounds fun.

I promise to tell lots of war stories if you want. ;)

1902
Books / Re: column: EUOLogy #6
« on: October 01, 2004, 08:50:21 PM »
Back to the great writer for the masses vs. great writer for the literary crowd topic:  Anyone thought about Shakespeare?  He was more of a Stephen King of his time than a James Joyce and I don't think there is anyone more universally studied in English departments today than he.

So can we expect Joyce to quietly fade away while King slowly creeps his way into the literary circles?  Will our descendants be studying Carrie or Cujo like we studied Merchant of Venice?

1903
Suggestions Box / Re: october events
« on: October 01, 2004, 08:36:48 PM »
Game night near the end of the month will be tricky for me because my parents and two brothers will all be in town both weekends.  

We've made Halloween our family gathering holiday since no one else travels then.

Nice thought though. ???

1904
Movies and TV / Re: Farehnheit 9/11
« on: October 01, 2004, 06:31:10 PM »
Ooh, good point.  His desire to be controversial and offend people is actually going to backfire on his political goals if he comes here.

Incidentally, I wonder if he will be happy if Kerry gets elected either.  In the debate last night Kerry stated that he would send troops into Sudan even if they didn't pose a threat to us in order to prevent another Rwanda.  I attach the quote below:

Question: Senator Kerry, you mentioned Darfur, the Darfur region of Sudan. Fifty thousand people have already died in that area. More than a million are homeless. And it's been labeled an act of ongoing genocide. Yet neither one of you or anyone else connected with your campaigns or your administration that I can find has discussed the possibility of sending in troops.

The tail end of Kerry's reply:
"...But I'll tell you this, as president, if it took American forces to some degree to coalesce the African Union, I'd be prepared to do it because we could never allow another Rwanda.

It's the moral responsibility for us and the world."

The whole text is here:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134152,00.html

So now sending American troops to foreign lands to prevent atrocities is OK, WMD or no.

1905
Rants and Stuff / Re: Oh, the mystery
« on: October 01, 2004, 04:24:47 PM »
I can't wait to get a cell phone so I can make the number restricted, call Stacer and fail to leave a message from wherever I happen to be when the whim strikes me, instead of having to do it from my house all the time. ;D

Pages: 1 ... 125 126 [127] 128