Timewaster's Guide Archive

Games => Video Games => Topic started by: Firemeboy on February 27, 2005, 03:58:02 PM

Title: Battlefield 2
Post by: Firemeboy on February 27, 2005, 03:58:02 PM
I'm pretty new here, but just heard about Battlefield 2, made by the same folks as Battlefield 1942, vietnam, etc.  Anyway, there is a new twist to the game.  After you move up rank sufficiently, you can take on the role of a general who doesn't actually play in the first-person shooter role, rather they have a 'god view'.  They watch where their team is (up to 32 players), can send in more ammo, call in air strike, etc.

I'm interested to see how it all plays out.  In Counter-Strike, I've seen people try to get folks to work together.  And it seems when you have folks with a plan, things go much better for all involved.  But almost without exception, everybody ignores the person trying to take on the leadership role.  It will be interesting to see if by having this role that allows a player to see the whole picture, other players will actually follow orders and work together as a team.

Anyway, comes out in June.  Looks to be pretty fun.  There is an article in Wired magazine on it, and the article may even be online by now.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on February 27, 2005, 08:38:41 PM
welcome to the boards, Firemeboy! Be sure to read the FAQ (http://www.timewastersguide.com/boards/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=news;action=display;num=1080380396) and to introduce yourself (http://www.timewastersguide.com/boards/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=news;action=display;num=1051196804)!
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Entsuropi on February 27, 2005, 10:13:52 PM
That role has been around plenty o times before. Check out Savage, Natural Selection, C&C Renegade.

But yes, BF2 looks interesting. I like the way that the commander gives orders to squad leaders who interpret them as way points for his men. Makes a lot more sense and more fun :)
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Firemeboy on February 27, 2005, 11:06:58 PM
Are those online games, though?  Does the person control AI, or actual people.  

I'm thinking about trying to do some official research on this.  That way I can get credit for school, and play Battlefield 2.  Oh, and it's a tax write-off...  :)
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Spriggan on February 27, 2005, 11:11:18 PM
they were online.  I know with savage you sort of controlled both, though I never played it.  There's never been a game that's pulled it off well before though, so I wouldn't get my hopes up too much.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Fellfrosch on February 28, 2005, 01:24:00 AM
Savage sounds very similar to what you're talking about, and I hated it--good idea, though. The thing that might make it work with BF2 is the way you haev to earn the right to be the leader. That would mean that you wouldn't get morons jumping in and out of the HQ all the time, you'd be more likely to get experienced players who know what they're doing.

That still doesn't mean that people would listen to him, as you say.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Firemeboy on February 28, 2005, 03:39:46 AM
Yeah, the thing I wonder is will the 'general' have some way to punish those that don't follow orders.  If so, that would, in my mind, lead to some very interesting questions...  I know at least, if you don't 'obey', the general might not call in an air-strike, or send you more ammo, but if there was some other way a general could punish, or reward obedience, then that may change things a bit...
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Spriggan on February 28, 2005, 05:34:46 AM
If they had any way of forceing player to do something then you'd see the game bomb.  No one, especially FPS players, want to have someone else be able to control your unit.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Entsuropi on February 28, 2005, 09:15:16 AM
In Savage everyone played the combat infantry units you usually get in fantasy RTS's, and were given waypoints, upgrades like speed, and new weapon options by the commander. They could also do the things like speed up building construction, do mining to get more cash in, kill animals for cash to get personal upgrades etc. The commander also controlled peon NPC's who did the basic building and mining stuff.

Great game, especially when you had 40 people a side with massive firefights and running melee battles. Felt like you were really in a wierd fantasy battle. It never did that well though, which is a shame.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Skar on February 28, 2005, 11:27:56 AM
I've been agitating for some time for a game like BF2 sounds.  Having given it a bit of thought, there has to be a feedback system where the "generals" and squad leaders get to give simple judgement on the quality of the FPSers, and a way for FPSers to judge "generals".  Essentially, if a general/squadleader gets a player who is messing things up, he should be able to boot him and put a call out online for another player to replace him mid-battle.

So, generals can judge FPSers by how many times they've been booted with malice (more than one kind of booting: malice for stupid guys who mess things up, benign for guys who are just inexperienced?) and FPSers can judge generals on their win-loss ratio.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Gemm: Rock & Roll Star; Born to Rock on February 28, 2005, 01:23:33 PM
Will players be able to choose if they want to be the general/squad leader?
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on February 28, 2005, 01:50:56 PM
I think a better system, rather than punishing people who don't follow orders, is some sort of reward for following orders.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Entsuropi on February 28, 2005, 01:52:08 PM
Well as i understand it there will be honour ratings in the game, and the more kills you get, objectives done etc your honour goes up. Teamkilling etc makes it go down, and you can put server limits on amount of honour needed...

What that means is you'll get high honour servers full of elitiests, and low honour ones full of idiots with a hard time trying to jump between them. Your system would be open to abuse with players spitefully knocking down each others ratings and stuff.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on February 28, 2005, 01:57:47 PM
If they're smart then, they'll also be able to mark servers as mid-level honor locations, so you can move through.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Fellfrosch on February 28, 2005, 02:08:46 PM
What any of these systems would exacerbate is the steep learning curve--there's no single player portion, so the only way to hone your skills is to play online, which would require you to play with jerks and potentially never get good at it. A good LAN party with friends might be the only way to play without getting roasted by morons or booted for inexperience.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Firemeboy on February 28, 2005, 02:12:43 PM
Cheating might be another problem.  From what I've seen, it's a recurring problem in CS, and if they can't stop it there...  Or who is to say that somebody doesn't set up some server, log on with a few friends, and just pads their numbers...  

I think there will need to be some kind of reciprocal feedback system in place.  Or if nothing else, the ability to view the stats on your 'general' to decide if you want to follow his/her orders.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Fellfrosch on March 28, 2005, 07:45:39 PM
Big preview: http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/battlefield2/preview_6120651.html

Battlefield 2 will feature built-in voice support and a headset packaged right in with the game. that's awesome. That in itself is enough to win my confidence, but some of the other features sound pretty cool as well. I'm still not sold on the commanders, but squad leaders sound awesome.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Skar on March 28, 2005, 07:56:35 PM
That sounds incredible.  I may have to spring for this one and waste bucketloads of time on it.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Firemeboy on June 18, 2005, 03:37:03 AM
Just played the demo version.  Looks to be fun, and I'm excited to see how the Comander feature works...

The 'extras' are nice.  When I'm running through bushes, sometimes I flush out a flock of birds, and they go flapping up into the sky.  The game also seems a bit more realistic that those I've played in the past.  You get hit a few times and you are down and out...  More like America's Army rather than CS or something.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Entsuropi on June 18, 2005, 04:59:30 PM
I've been playing this a LOT.

It's very good.

TV missiles fired from cobra helicopter = win.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Firemeboy on June 18, 2005, 09:12:13 PM
Cobra helicoptors...

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/The_GI_Joe-Transformers_War
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Fellfrosch on June 21, 2005, 02:37:56 PM
Official review from Gamespot: http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/battlefield2/review.html?q=1&tag=gs_hp_flashtop_read

Sounds awesome. Also, it sounds like I need a new video card.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Spriggan on June 22, 2005, 12:06:16 AM
Well you are going to be in vegas for a week...
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Fellfrosch on June 22, 2005, 11:45:54 AM
I'll bet 10 on red and 10 on black--I'll win every time!
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on June 22, 2005, 11:57:24 AM
and never get ahead
of course, it could always come up green.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Firemeboy on June 23, 2005, 01:43:44 PM
I purchased Battlefield 2 last night (on DVD, that was quite handy), and it is a very enjoyable game.  However, the true fun would come, I think, in getting several friends that would make up a squad, and really get to know each others' strenghth and weakness.  Work together, practice together, and then go kick some tail.

Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: The Jade Knight on June 23, 2005, 04:38:36 PM
Did Renegade actually have a general?

I didn't think it did...
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Mr_Pleasington on August 02, 2005, 03:44:27 PM
If any of you want to squad up, I play pretty regularly at the Rogue Saints ranked server IP 70.85.243.98 10211

It's my housemate's clan and while I'm not a member the gameplay there is good.  Lot of chatter, virtually everyone squads up.  

I really wish the game had a friend list and favorite server tab.  I hear it's coming, but it should have been shipped.
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Entsuropi on August 02, 2005, 04:10:29 PM
Heh. I play on my clans server, and I got made a squad leader of all things. Real ultimate power is now mine!
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: Mr_Pleasington on August 02, 2005, 04:20:30 PM
Heh! Real ultimate power.

I'll take you out any day of the week with my grenade laucher!  Any day!
Title: Re: Battlefield 2
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on August 02, 2005, 04:23:46 PM
i don't believe you. I believe you bought the sniper kit. (http://www.nuklearpower.com/daily.php?date=050801)