there's your problem, Lost One. This is an international forum, and it is not governed by any group you have passed the bar for. In short, you are very unqualified to make judgements or to properly review the evidence in this case.
I find you in contempt of court and fine you several thousand dollars. Payable to FMJ and myself. FMJ as the other judge in the case is allowed to set the exact sum.
Although E's argument is not properly substantiated and lack foundation. FMT makes two interestng argument but the first is one relies on unproven assumptions and for the second argument, the "Arrr" is not dispositive evidence.
Now you're stretching. My position is well documented.
FMJ's argument is no an "unproven assumption" it is based on the actual definition of the two concepts.
The ninja is defined by his silent and unobtrusive behavior, staying in the shadows until he strikes.
A pirate, on the other hand, relies on showboating to strike fear into their victims. Because the very concepts of their professions are so contradictory, they are inherantly incompatible. This extends also to their dress and grooming. Again, pirates are flashy (and tacky, frankly) and try to stand out. Ninjas dress to avoid detection.
And don't give me the switching roles, argument. A pirate is always a pirate. He cannot move out of the role. A ninja is always a ninja, and must always be in that role. (unless he is also
a doctor). And therefore, while they can have multiple careers, they must select careers that they can practice while maintaining their original identity.
Ninjas cannot become pirates (in your example) because to do so would be to deny their ninja heritage, thereby losing all benefits (as Jeffe pointed out).
"Dispositive" has nothing to do with anything. "Arr" need not be dispositive. It is an example of pirate behavior, not an argument about how you're wrong.
