keep in mind that
Each nation has it's own intrests
For 1 nation to climb, another must decend
Currently the US is at the top of the Geopolitical ladder in respect to economics and Might.
Therefore, any nation that wants to get to the top has to displace the USA
Thus I am not supprised that many of the upper echelon nations have taken the current global instablity to help better their own situation at the expense of the USA.
From a completly Machivellian standpoint, I could easily see the Italian Government setting the US up for a fall by not communicating this event. This would allow the global community to give the US another black eye in the aftermath and possibly isolate it from more of it's allies.
Keep in mind that this therory is entirely speculation and based upon an unporoven assumption that National leaders are only concerned with their own nation's advancement.
That said, I have found that many of the comments and criticisms from Europian posters on the internet tend to believe, as an article of faith, that GW Bush's motivations are just as, if not more selfish than the motives I have pointed out above. The concept that GW is an Idealist in the cause of liberty is laughed off as Jingoist fantasy when it is just political optomism.
So, yes, there is tension. In the US, it feels like we are the ones trying to fix the world's problems, while Europe sits back with a "you will fail so don't try attitude"
I am guessing that in Europe (from other statements I have read) It feels like Europians are respecting other nation's privacy while the US keeps barging in and barking orders.
As to where I stand... Well, I believe in what we are doing and I think that evidence that it is working in currentl displayed with the possible pull-out of Syria from Lebanon.
I think Bush applied preasure at the correct point to effect a series of events that will lead to the mid-east equivelant of the fall of the Berlin wall.
But I would be classified as an Idealist and Optomist.