Timewaster's Guide Archive

Games => Video Games => Topic started by: Slant on November 07, 2002, 03:17:02 PM

Title: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: Slant on November 07, 2002, 03:17:02 PM
Has anybody else seen the new Bond game?  It looks incredible.  I was at a Target the other night and there was a big screen tv with the game on it and I swear I thought it was one of the movies; that's how realistic it looks.  Even if you couldn't give a dog's dinner about James Bond, go take a look at this one.
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: Spriggan on November 07, 2002, 05:26:57 PM
while all the latest bond movies have sucked the video games have been some of the best action/FPS games around.  Just look at golden eye for the N64, it's still a game people play today.  if you buy/rent it write a review for it and send it to me.
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: Mr_Pleasington on November 10, 2002, 07:10:41 PM
The new Bond game does indeed look cool, Slant...although Agent Under Fire wasn't all that great.  Hopefully this next one will bring the Bond series back to its former glory.

Timesplitters 2 just came out though and it was designed by the same folks who did Goldeneye and Perfect Dark (both games I played a lot in undergrad...when we weren't playing Super Smash Bros. that is).   It's only the second Gamecube game that goes on my "Must Own" List
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: German_Hamburger on January 21, 2006, 06:16:16 AM
I love James Bond nightfire for Ps2. A superb game with brilliant multiplayer options and great levels. Truly worth playing.
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: Mr_Pleasington on January 21, 2006, 08:39:51 AM
Wow.  You take thread necromancy to a new level, Hamburger.
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: German_Hamburger on January 21, 2006, 11:42:45 AM
In english please
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: German_Hamburger on January 21, 2006, 03:21:44 PM
Yeah I did realise that I was bringing up a long lost subject but thanks to Spriggen's advice I decided not to make my own and look for an old one.
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: Spriggan on January 21, 2006, 03:50:30 PM
oh, you did not just go there.

I asked you to READ the FAQ in which is states three very important things.

SECOND ITEM: Avoid 'spam' posting.

THIRD ITEM:  Don't resurrect old threads.

SIXTH ITEM: Don't post to a thread twice in a row.

which you have constantly ignored and violated.  You have to use some common sense here, don't start a new thread where there are 2 "what are you reading threads" that are only a few weeks old, however don't resurrect a thread that's 4 years old and several pages back.

You've earned yourself a probation buddy.
(http://www.legacieslost.com/graphics/title-probation.png)
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: Tage on January 22, 2006, 09:48:57 PM
Awwww, that poor kitty!
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: MAa_sprig_smells on January 23, 2006, 04:02:09 PM
Thought you said it had a probation. Anyway my interlectual friends tell me that this is an excellant site run by great people. But as I do not know my way around can you direct me to the FAQ.
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: Archon on January 23, 2006, 05:01:12 PM
Your interlectual friends? I think you are going for intellectual there, pal. Why don't you have your interlectual friends teach you a thing or two about basic English before you try to post?
Title: Re: Bond.  James Bond.
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on January 23, 2006, 05:38:08 PM
These are Arkansas intellectuals.