« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8   Go Down

Author Topic: SPIDER-MAN 2!  (Read 10052 times)

Mistress of Darkness

  • Level 37
  • *
  • Posts: 2322
  • Fell Points: 0
  • Mama
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2003, 12:23:26 PM »
Her acting is not that bad. You want to pick on someone, go off on Natalie Portman.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2003, 12:23:54 PM by Treyva »
Logged
" If i ever need a pen-name I'd choose EUOL, just to confuse everyone. " --Entropy

Mr_Pleasington

  • Level 35
  • *
  • Posts: 2141
  • Fell Points: 2
  • The only prescription, baby!
    • View Profile
    • Endless Hordes Wiki
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2003, 01:10:35 PM »
C'mon SE, she looks like somone put a pumpkin on a microphone stand.  Her body just looks out of proportion.  And lets not forget her empty head.

Natalie Portman has proven to be a fine actress outside of any movie with either the word "Star" or the word "Wars" in the title.   I blame Lucas.
Logged

fuzzyoctopus

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4556
  • Fell Points: 0
  • fearsome and furry
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2003, 01:55:38 PM »
Quote
Love Mary Jane.

Hate Kirsten Dunst

Her last good role was in Interview with a Vampire.

She can't act, is dumber than a box of rocks, and is nearly painful to look at with that gigantic empty head of hers.  It's like an orange on toothpick.



Sorry, you're wrong.  I don't think she'll win any Oscars, but I think she's a fine actress, and she's very very pretty.  And my opinion is probably worth more than Eric's because it's not hormonally driven.

Logged
"Hr hr! dwn wth vwls!" - Spriggan

I reject your reality, and substitute my own. - Adam Savage, Mythbusters

French is a language meant to be butchered, especially by drunk Scotts. - Spriggan

The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers

  • Administrator
  • Level 96
  • *****
  • Posts: 19211
  • Fell Points: 17
  • monkeys? yes.
    • View Profile
    • herb's world
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2003, 02:35:33 PM »
i thought the hormone factor was what we were ARGUING about.
Logged

Gemm: Rock & Roll Star; Born to Rock

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4591
  • Fell Points: 0
  • I Am Your Worst Nightmare's Dream
    • View Profile
    • Perfect
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2003, 02:52:42 PM »
I say that would be something worth having, a kirsten dunst. Something I'd like to have atop my nightstand.
Logged
“NOTHING IS TRUE. EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED.”
                William S. Burroughs

“Who needs girls when you’ve got comics?”
                Grant Morrison’s Flex Mentallo

The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers

  • Administrator
  • Level 96
  • *****
  • Posts: 19211
  • Fell Points: 17
  • monkeys? yes.
    • View Profile
    • herb's world
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2003, 02:56:01 PM »
Amen.
Logged

fuzzyoctopus

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4556
  • Fell Points: 0
  • fearsome and furry
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #21 on: December 17, 2003, 02:56:29 PM »
*blink*
Logged
"Hr hr! dwn wth vwls!" - Spriggan

I reject your reality, and substitute my own. - Adam Savage, Mythbusters

French is a language meant to be butchered, especially by drunk Scotts. - Spriggan

Mistress of Darkness

  • Level 37
  • *
  • Posts: 2322
  • Fell Points: 0
  • Mama
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #22 on: December 17, 2003, 05:08:55 PM »
I've seen other Natalie Portman movies and her acting is just as flat in those as in Star Wars. Though I will have to say that the infection of flat acting that afflicts Episode 1 and 2 is probably due to bad directing.

Kirsten Dunst is much more well rounded and very pretty. You're smokin' something Mr. P.
Logged
" If i ever need a pen-name I'd choose EUOL, just to confuse everyone. " --Entropy

42

  • Staff
  • Level 56
  • *
  • Posts: 4350
  • Fell Points: 8
  • Unofficial World Saver
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #23 on: December 17, 2003, 05:09:56 PM »
Kirsten Dunst isn't that ugly. Though I think it's about time her mother told her what a bra is for.
Logged
The Folly of youth is to think that intelligence is a subsitute for experience. The folly of age is to think that experience is a subsitute for intelligence.

Mistress of Darkness

  • Level 37
  • *
  • Posts: 2322
  • Fell Points: 0
  • Mama
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #24 on: December 17, 2003, 05:19:13 PM »
I'm sure she knows 42. But her costume designers and image consultants have convinced her that 70s is back in.
Logged
" If i ever need a pen-name I'd choose EUOL, just to confuse everyone. " --Entropy

42

  • Staff
  • Level 56
  • *
  • Posts: 4350
  • Fell Points: 8
  • Unofficial World Saver
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #25 on: December 17, 2003, 05:37:58 PM »
Oh sure, blame her image consultants and costume designers. They must be some really bad image consultants and costume designers. The only thing that should jiggle that much in public is Jell-O.
Logged
The Folly of youth is to think that intelligence is a subsitute for experience. The folly of age is to think that experience is a subsitute for intelligence.

Mistress of Darkness

  • Level 37
  • *
  • Posts: 2322
  • Fell Points: 0
  • Mama
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #26 on: December 17, 2003, 05:50:01 PM »
Or bigger breasts.
Logged
" If i ever need a pen-name I'd choose EUOL, just to confuse everyone. " --Entropy

Gemm: Rock & Roll Star; Born to Rock

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4591
  • Fell Points: 0
  • I Am Your Worst Nightmare's Dream
    • View Profile
    • Perfect
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #27 on: December 17, 2003, 05:53:38 PM »
Its kind of obvious who they're targeting with the movies. Adolescent's who have little ideas of comics, and men who enjoy the boobage. Put mayhaps it won't be so prolific in this next one. Because well, MJ was always so 'stand-outish' in the comics.
Logged
“NOTHING IS TRUE. EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED.”
                William S. Burroughs

“Who needs girls when you’ve got comics?”
                Grant Morrison’s Flex Mentallo

Entsuropi

  • Level 60
  • *
  • Posts: 5033
  • Fell Points: 0
  • =^_^= Captain of the highschool Daydreaming team
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #28 on: December 17, 2003, 05:59:23 PM »
Kirsten dunst - plain. She was... unattractive in the wet t-shirt scene.
Natalie portman - not bad, but nothing to write home about i think.
Prefer the woman in PotC to both.

But i don't know if she is that bad an actor. She did not stand out as bad...
Logged
If you're ever in an argument and Entropy winds up looking staid and temperate in comparison, it might be time to cut your losses and start a new thread about something else :)

Fellfrosch

Mistress of Darkness

  • Level 37
  • *
  • Posts: 2322
  • Fell Points: 0
  • Mama
    • View Profile
Re: SPIDER-MAN 2!
« Reply #29 on: December 17, 2003, 08:40:03 PM »
Keira Knightley. She was very pretty. And she wore a corset through most of the movie, so no jiggling issues.
Logged
" If i ever need a pen-name I'd choose EUOL, just to confuse everyone. " --Entropy
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8   Go Up
« previous next »