Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lethalfalcon

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
91
Here's me, late again (although I'm still ahead of Silk, yay!).

I think my biggest problem with this whole chapter is that Aedon is supposedly the strongest Deviator of them all, and yet, he still does a lot of mundane things. He disrupts a meeting... by pushing open the doors forcefully. I mean, there are *much* better ways to ruin a meeting than opening a door.

Along those minds, why didn't he just freeze *everyone* in the room? That would certainly get everyone's attention, and since they couldn't move, he would be free to give instructions in silence. Surely if he's so powerful, he could manage that, no? (Or something similar and much more dramatic).

I will definitely agree with the earlier criticism between Aedon and Lenalt: you don't simultaneously look up at your best military officers and still berate them for half the chapter. It makes no sense. Either he's good, and you're happy, or he sucks, and you get rid of him. You also don't proceed to annoy him. Honestly, if I were Lenalt, I'd defect (I've left several jobs because the higher ups were jerks). It's better than being kicked around like an abused puppy.

Also, if he's such a great strategist, why is he not in control of the mages? Mages (and more specifically, their craft) are tools in a war. Nothing more. The people who know how to plan get to decide how to use those tools. For the Chaosmages to be self-directing, they had better know how to play war, because otherwise, they're going to end up costing a lot of normal lives as they do the wrong things at the wrong times. If they *are* good strategists, why aren't they directing the normal army instead? They'd be far more capable of it (sending messages, scrying, etc.) than a normal person could ever hope to be.

So, in the end, there are a lot of oddities that don't make sense. Now, that's not to say that they can't exist, but there needs to be a pretty darn good reason *why* things are the way they are, because it's not the status quo. And I need to see those reasons real quick, because otherwise, your whole chapter gets a big WTF from me. :(

Still, the writing itself isn't that bad, if a little info-dumpy. Try not to dull your machete. :)

Edit: Oh, and one more thing, did Aedon really just leave Lenalt behind? That's not very nice of him. It's like putting a goat in a den of lions. :P

92
Reading Excuses / Re: Your Background
« on: December 28, 2009, 09:12:02 AM »
Hey, another Loganite (Loganian? Logander?). Enjoying the cold weather? I'm up here too. Welcome to the group.

93
Okay... well, it looks like you've already gotten the sound beating I was going to give you (curse me for getting behind). In short, I have to agree with others' opinions that this part just isn't that good. Normally I would try to follow this up with some things I did enjoy, but... sorry, it isn't going to happen.

Lucard is an ass. This is interesting, because the original picture I got was that they were some sort of paladin. However, the big problem is that there's no *reason* for him to act the way he does, at least not that I can see. Is he just evil for the sake of being evil? He doesn't seem to be just having a bad day, so I'm guessing this is how he normally is. So show us why! It would be very cool to see this paladin gone blackguard because of Asharia's corruption.

Which brings me to my next point. If Asharia's pissed off at the royal family, why are they still graced? For that matter, is this King Lyro? I never got the prologue, so I can't make the comparison, and you never give the king's name in this chapter.

Oh, wait, there's something I like. The mines having salt, and it fetching a premium. Perhaps this wasn't intentional on your part, but salt was really elite in the old days, especially in places away from the sea. Salt mines were also worked by prisoners, generally. :)  On the flip side, though, I have absolutely no idea what you're actually mining for. My *guess* would be that it's to get behind enemy lines (from the war talk), but it's never made clear.

My biggest problem, by far, is that we've had 5 chapters of Baltier (and friends), and now here's this major. In most books, by that many chapters with only one PoV (I'd assume your prologue was from Lyro, though), I'd start to think that it only had one. That's not bad, but throwing in another character seems a little weird to me. I understand that he might not make much sense before this point, but I guess this might just be because I think the first 3 chapters felt a little lost compared to these new ones.

I would agree with the use of nubile. It's simply another word for sexually attractive, and I think you're already accomplishing that. If you want something more powerful, use a word to describe her breasts more directly. I'm a little confused, though, because you say she's barely coming into womanhood, but her breasts are large enough to hold up her loose gown. My guess is that they're buxom, given that they're holding up her gown. I'm sure a female would have a better idea how to describe her adequately.

So... a lot more character development needed to make Lucard believable (and I feel horrible saying that with my oh-so-flat characters).

94
Ah, yes, KE=(1/2)mv2 (superscript is that little icon that says "sup" on it, or you can use ^ to mean power). Either way, if his velocity is already high, he can directly impart that to the ax by stopping himself and letting the ax continue forward with momentum. It makes sense, where stopping does not. I concede this point and will change it.

Being stronger does not allow you to put more mass behind a blow, though. A 500 lb. fat computer gaming blob has more mass than a 260 lb. body builder, but the 260lb body builder will hit you harder with a weapon any day. Now I *could* say that he infused his arms with more mass, but the amount would likely be inconsequential in the equation. It's far better to just go faster (because it's squared).

And I'm not saying that there's absolutely no defensive possibilities of an overhead strike... just that it leaves you really wide open and is fairly predictable, which generally reduces its effectiveness in battle.

And amen, D&D rules make absolutely no sense if you're going for realism. If you want that, go for Rifts, or GURPS. Or better yet, invent a time machine and go back to the 1400s. You'll just need to make your own magic. :)

What about my other question, regarding the tension? I'm less concerned that you don't understand the entirety of my magic system by page 8 (with regards to metal holding runes better), and more concerned with your boredom in the Prologue (where I need to get you hooked).

95
You asked, so here are some answers, and some more questions.

An ax (more specifically, a horseman's ax) has a haft long enough to use both hands. Given that he doesn't have a shield, you usually *would* use an ax in two hands unless you were following through on a swing or an opponent has flanked you. You have more control, the ability to switch hands to  attack people at your sides, and you can transfer the control to force by shifting your top hand down the haft as you strike, just like how you bust up concrete with a sledgehammer or chop wood with an ax.

Now, I can agree that the way I convey the one sentence at the heart of your problem is a little off--technically you position your body in a stance that allows for more reaction in both offense and defense, rather than a purely offensive or defensive stance (overhead strike being an example of a purely offensive stance). So, since the whole sentence was written to show that he was being careful, would a sentence like this work better?

Quote
Jirath drew an axe from his belt before entering the room, wary of any hidden intruders.

With this sentence, I don't say exactly how he accomplishes being ready to attack or defend as the situation presents himself, which leaves it up to the reader.

As for the armor, there are several very good reasons why it's still metal. First off, a rune's durability is directly proportional to the material it is inscribed upon. Cotton doesn't last as long as metal, no matter how you slice it. Second, there could potentially be areas where magic just does not work. At least then your metal armor will still stop some things.

I will agree that I should not bother with making him stop to transfer his infusion from speed to strength. It would be far better to just let him run at the man, and then let the speed of his movement transfer into the speed of his arms by planting his foot.

D&D though? Sure, I play (3.5 edition, though, so no, not old skool), but I really fail to see the comparison. Dex really doesn't do much for speed. You can't make more attacks, you can't move faster... you pretty much get dodge, reflex saves, and some skill bonuses. You can't really switch one for the other in the system, either. I was actually thinking of it more from an engineering standpoint, specifically electrical, where you can have either short bursts of a lot of power, or longer bursts of lower power, although that argument is a little flawed anyway. Making yourself stronger would be more useful if he were, say, lifting something heavy, or crushing people. Stupid physics, making F=ma. But I digress... :)

Perhaps my build up is a little boring. I'd thought about having them walk past carnage on the base floor, but didn't really want to goo half the tower. It also would have been a more early notification of an intrusion, when really the tower's ancient alarm is the first notification they have. Perhaps, though, I want that earlier alarm. I'll have to think about it. Would walking through death build tension more, if it had enough detail to show you what they were about to come up against, instead of an exploded door and some broken traps/wards, or are you looking for something else?

Thank you for the critique, though. I expect no less than a thorough bashing from you (which is a good thing). And I'm glad that it's infinitely better. Hopefully my reworked chapter 2 is infinitely better than this, and I can rip a hole in the space-time continuum. :)

96
Okay, I'm going to start playing catch-up on critiques....

There are a lot of new "characters" introduced in this chapter, namely all the voices in his head that weren't present before (I'd guess from his little incident at the end of the last chapter). However, all these come as a bit of a shock to me as a reader. Echoing the rest of the posts, I would also recommend that you put this at the beginning. Here's why:

1) You don't have to explain how he managed to miraculously avoid death from something that really should have killed him. Being possessed does not usually save you from a perforated kidney, so I'm still a little WTF on that. :)
2) You have a lot more action with a definite goal, and I just kept on reading it, unlike a lot of the other chapters, where I was struggling with "what's the point" at times.
3) Your time jumps up 'til now have been very spastic and unpredictable. If they all became flashbacks, it would make more sense to me, especially if you were able to orient the reader to what time it was. "Baltier thought back to his release two years ago..." or somesuch.
4) You don't have a bunch of extra voices just appear out of nowhere. You instead introduce him as this odd possessed schizo right from the start, and the flashbacks end up showing you that he was "normal" at one point. You have external and internal conflict right at the beginning of the book.

Otherwise, I thought it was a pretty good chapter. I could really see the maniac running around gleefully hacking people to bits... although his exact movements from person to person were a bit shrouded, which I'm not sure matters to most people.

I have a few nitpicky things, but I'll send those to you in line-edits.

To respond to other comments: I count four daggers that he lost; one to the lieutenant, two to guardsmen on the other side of the portcullis, and one in a guard's ear. He had at least six: one in his hat, one in his sash and "He had five more tucked into the folds of his shirt behind his back." (direct sentence) Also, there were 7 guards and 4 "servants" killed in the instant, so it was right (not all of them are explained, though). In total, 10 guards were killed (the lieutenant was the eighth, and the two guards on the other side of the portcullis were 9 and 10). I'm kinda picky about head counts, so I might have picked up on it a bit from my OCD. :P

97
Hrm, so it appears I need to remove some of the RAFO-ing, because you're too lost. Part of the problem, though, is that the characters don't *know* why these things are happening, so telling the reader would be... meta-narrating. For instance:

Quote
No one had ever been able to break the wards to this room. Historical texts, written by mages generations ago implied that they had been put there by the Lirians themselves to protect the nation. From what, they didn't say.

Is there really any way I can inform the reader that the entire tower is a giant spell canon when no one around has that knowledge?

Do I really have too much history? I count 5 sentences. The first set is there to show that they're both councilors, and the second is to explain why they're running in gung-ho instead of waiting for the others. If it's too much, I can cut it, but I'll wait for the polls on this one.

I can have them speak out more. That's probably better, as you noted. I tend to be a little more passive, which isn't the best, I know.

Her father is Jiranth... but how can I show that (this is not rhetorical; I really want to know some way to do so)? Little children don't usually refer to their fathers by name. Ooh, i might know a way. Aliese knew her father would be awake because it was his night to watch over the giant rune that detects magical presence (think of it like a spell radar for the city). I could have Tarone note that as well, which would imply the connection... would that be enough?

The death... yeah, that was the snap. Mages who have children get a little bond. It doesn't give any empathic or telepathic information, but it's there, like a warm fuzzy. I could elaborate on that a bit.

Thanks for the review. More stuff to think on. :)

98
Enjoy and eviscerate!

99
Reading Excuses / Re: Email List + Submission Dates
« on: December 20, 2009, 08:57:57 PM »
Okay, I've put this off long enough. I'm going to submit something tomorrow. Work can wait. :P

100
Reading Excuses / Re: Dec7 -- Godsplay -- Chapter One -- Vegetathalas
« on: December 09, 2009, 01:20:25 PM »
Overall, I liked about half of this chapter. The other half... well, it's been mentioned before--the frolicking about just does not fit the scene we came from, nor the scene we're thrown right back into at the end of this chapter. It feels like you want to show that she's living a normal, somewhat happy life, but you quickly change to show that no, she's not. It makes me wonder what point it serves to have her get warm fuzzies from Mel. Perhaps this is just the pessimist in me speaking, because I know I certainly wouldn't, given the realities of the world pressing against me.

Okay, on to the specifics (all in my not-so-humble opinion):

The first sentence - This really has to go. At least the first part of it. "Fifty-six years... " you're directly talking to the reader. I know it might be vital information at some point, but why does it matter as the first three words in the first chapter? Your POV is different, and the subject of Cien being the grandfather is brought up, so that illustrates that two generations have passed. An exact year is likely irrelevant to the reader. If it needs to be known, I'm sure you could find a good way to show the reader, through dialogue, journals, etc.  Also, it bears no connection to the second half of the sentence, describing the Weeper trees. Did they just now start reigning over the swampland? Took them 56 years? Why haven't they always been there on top? Too many questions immediately popped into my head that are very likely irrelevant.

Your description is holding up well, compared to the last chapter. It's very vivid, easy to picture... okay, I'm going to comment on this a little (almost thought I'd have pure praise there... can't have that). You use "like" a lot. I know the similes are part of what gives your description such vividness, but I count 32 times in 3000 words. Sometimes they're very close together, too. After the first dozen or so, I start actually looking for them. "Ah, another thing that's like something else," I say as I spot the next twenty. You only have two places where you use "as" in the same way. One of them is sing-songy: "as rich as rot". I'm sure other people will probably disagree with me on this, but I've seen you use other methods to describe things, and most of them flow better.

If your linen skirt manages to get caught on a thorn while you're running and drags you to a stop, it's very likely going to: a) rip the skirt immediately, b) disrobe you, or c) rip the thorn off the plant. This is assuming your linen is not some sort of super-material. I know that I've ripped shirts before running past sharp hooked things (nails in trees, for instance), and I know I've brought home a collection of twigs and those blasted thorny seeds from weeds adorned to my clothing, and none of them stopped me. Staggered, maybe (in the case of the nails), but never stopped. If she's running helter-skelter, no wimpy bush is going to stop her.

There are a number of places that you stop using italics for thought-speak, which makes it very hard to spot sometimes. I'll try to mark them up in my line-edits.

Most of the encounter with Baeratia I had no problem with. It had some tension, which is good. One thing I was a little confused about: why would a Twilight Person use a greeting like "The sun rises"? To me, that would be a negative thing for a Dark Elv. Perhaps you mean it to be negative, but then why would Rachell repeat it? Does she have bad news as well? I would have expected something more like "The moon rises" or "The sun sets" or "The stars shine brightly". Something to do with night. Dunno.

And the chapter ends. With nothing really happening.  Hrm. I'm left with a whole bunch of questions. What happens to Shaeradis? She just got dismissed, even though she's bleeding profusely. From the way you wrote it, she was already on the verge of death. Can she really wait for Baeratia to deliver the Dreams? What are the dreams? What made the Elvs go to Ravke to find Rachell instead of either finding her themselves, or finding her father?

This whole chapter seems like it's leading up to something, and then just stops. It's great for a cliffhanger, but especially near the beginning of the book, you need lots of hooks (which I should know having just been ripped a new one for the exact same problem). I know that something is up, but I have no idea what. Some people may enjoy the mystery, but to me it's a little odd not to know anything about what's going on. Granted, I likely wouldn't put the book down, because it takes a special kind of suck to get me to do that: only Christopher Paolini and J.K. Rowling have managed that so far. :)

And to answer one of your questions about the Elvs: I don't particularly have a problem with your explanation, but unless that's made clear somewhere early in the book, you're going to get punished for it. Writing fantasy where technology has devolved has to be done very carefully. Anne McCaffrey's Pern series does the same thing, and some of how she does it is very... distasteful to a lot of readers. Without any back story or revelation early on, your book clearly falls into the fantasy realm, and inserting science fiction elements later on makes it look like it was an afterthought, even though you've already demonstrated that you thought of it well in advance. One way to get around this is to have Ancient devices (working or not) that point to there having been high technology at some point.

One really bad problem with your Elvs, Lomari, and Humans is that they just about exactly mimic Elves, Half-Elves, and Humans in D&D. Light and dark elves (wood/high elves and drow, respectively) both exist, and are very similar to your concepts. Half-Elves consider themselves superior as well, but everyone hates them. I don't know if this is an intentional comparison, but I can see it.

I have little to complain about your prose, though. Your sentences are generally very tight, and you've removed a lot of early-draft cruft.  Oh, and you don't post often enough for me to read further. :)

101
Reading Excuses / Re: Dec 7 - Chaos - Operation Cop Out
« on: December 08, 2009, 11:44:59 AM »
I never saw the first time this was submitted, so I can't really compare the two, but to me, this sounded a lot like the Lord Ruler in Mistborn 3, in the little chapter pre-text blurbs.

I agree with Frog that God seems to be talking to someone, but we have no idea who.

Is the Worldslayer his creation as well? I get the feeling that he is and isn't, depending on the sentence.

He starts out talking about the Worldslayer, but then goes on in the next paragraph to recollect every universe that has been destroyed. They should probably connect. "I recall every other world that has been destroyed..."

Worth what moment? The final days of his Plan? Well, everything is just going to be sacrificed, killed by the Worldslayer, so really? His moments aren't very worthwhile, in my opinion. I mean, at the end, you speak that "freedom awaits", but that's not made clear until after.

Most people understand that God is timeless, world-less, and fate-less. That's mostly the definition of a god anyway. Would he really be monologuing such? It sounds a lot like "take pity on me; just because you're going to die, remember that I've seen countless deaths in my existence and cannot escape them." An emo god is really hard for me to comprehend. He's all-powerful, but he can't deal with these fiddling emotions? Maybe he shouldn't have signed up for the job. :P

Quote
This was all for Good and all Life.
Wha? This sentence makes no sense. It's some sort of holy sentence fragment.

I really don't like the last sentence/paragraph, either. You have this powerful "Know that" repetition, and then you switch to "Remember that". If you're going to be telling people to know something, you can't assume that they originally knew that everything happens for a reason. They need to know two things (that they should already know), but just remember the third.

So there you go. My critique is successfully longer than your submission. Cool, eh? :)

102
Reading Excuses / Re: Do We Want A Website?
« on: December 08, 2009, 11:23:24 AM »
I'm a little confused by your argument, Silk. You say that you don't want to move RE away from TWG because people can pop in and contribute who aren't members, but I don't really see how that's possible, if they aren't getting the material. Sure, there are a few scattered threads that don't pertain directly to submissions, but those are few and far between. The bulk of the threads here are on submission critiques, which no one but those on "the list" can really talk about.

As for the ability to get older submissions, you state that people prefer knowing who their work is going out to, but in essence, a new person could get added to the list with only you and Chaos knowing, and then they get all new material without others really knowing (unless they first post in the welcome thread and people read it). I'd actually prefer *not* to have to dredge up material to resend to someone who's new to the list. If they were accepted to the list, someone trusts them to get my material anyway, whether I like it or not. I can't choose not to send to a new person simply because I don't know them. A more fine-grained permission system would notify existing group members when a new member was added, and optionally have an opt-in system for that new user to see existing users' works, on a per-user basis. This would prevent old users who no longer wanted to have their works available from having to worry about them being made so--of course, they could also just cancel their account or mark all their works as private and go invisible, too.

Honestly, without the TWG admins' support and their contribution of an API of sorts to access the data in the forums, there's no way to set up anything easier and more streamlined without moving it all off of TWG. Or, they could actually implement a document submission system of their own, but either one requires significant coding on their part (the site I'm working on to act as a full group critiquting system is already over 2k lines of code, and that's just the PHP, not counting the couple dozen HTML templates and stylesheet files).

If we just want a front-end for a door mat, I'm not really sure it matters. The whole point of RE is submissions--the forum does a pretty good job illustrating that.

103
Reading Excuses / Re: Do We Want A Website?
« on: December 05, 2009, 12:22:24 AM »
I get paid for my web development as well. Have my own company and everything. Work out of my house, make my own hours, etc. Couldn't ask for a much better job... but yeah, programming as a hobby is much more fun, I'll agree.

104
Reading Excuses / Re: Do We Want A Website?
« on: December 04, 2009, 11:50:49 PM »
Heh, I'm a graduated business information systems major by day (slacker), web developer by night (I work better then). I've actually written my own framework to use for the site, already (I can't stand existing frameworks; they're too bloated). I'll let everyone know when it's... field testable. Unfortunately, it's a little lower priority than my normal work, but I build things from time to time for my clients that I end up able to migrate over to it, so I get paid indirectly for it. :)

105
Reading Excuses / Re: Do We Want A Website?
« on: December 04, 2009, 12:07:40 PM »
Personally, I'll never trust any data of mine to Google. They have a very... lackluster approach to data security with regards to their indexing (they *are* a data mining company, first and foremost). They also have a tendency to randomly go down, which I attribute mainly to the massive system they have to keep running (a smaller site is *easier* to keep up). They also *do* cancel projects from time to time, especially if they're losing too much money. Google as a company may not disappear, but their services are not set in stone. Google groups in general also have *huge* issues with spam, to the point where a good number of groups have left because of it.

That said, I can understand the same issues with regards to me setting up a site for others to use. It's all about trust. Certainly, I know that the data is as safe as I can make it, and I know I won't be giving it out to anyone else, but I have to convince everyone else, which is much harder.

If the main issue is really that people don't want to have another account, I find that a little sad. I probably create one or two accounts per week to sites. There are more and more places that are going to login systems as it is, because it's more secure, and you have greater control over the content. You have to have a username/password for your email too, and that's very likely different from the one you use here. What do people do in that case? My guess is that they just save the password. Any additional site wouldn't be much different.

Also, I'm not quite sure Google Docs has the functionality that RE needs. The only thing it would change is Google Docs + TWG instead of email + TWG, or Google Groups + Google Docs (which really isn't that well integrated at all). What I'm proposing is actually moving over the entire system to a single solution. Document posting + revision control + integrated forum.

Google Docs also doesn't have a very fine-grained permissions system in place to deal with different levels of access. My alpha site already has these permissions: private, write-collaboration, read-write collaboration, members, and public. This is on a per-part basis (a part is a section of a work, be it a chapter, act, etc.). So you can work on anything you want on the site and mark it private, and no-one can see it. When it's ready, you can either mark it to another level, or you can use a special function called "publish for critique", which will flag that revision as group-readable and make it available to whatever groups you're a member of. It sounds complex, but to the user it's just two buttons. [Save] and [Publish for Critique] at the bottom of your editor. All the grunt work is handle by the revision system. If you make changes, you're free to publish a new version to overwrite the old one (although I'd have to put some sort of limiter in there to prevent people from spamming the group with publish notifications--probably something like once per week per (person|work|part)--which would be configurable by the group moderators).

I've actually been thinking about this site for a lot longer than I've been in this writing group. The group has given me new insight into functionalities I want it to have, though.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10