Timewaster's Guide Archive

Departments => Books => Topic started by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on March 02, 2006, 12:01:40 PM

Title: Review: Inkheart
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on March 02, 2006, 12:01:40 PM
reference: http://www.timewastersguide.com/view.php?id=1263
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Nessa on March 02, 2006, 12:16:33 PM
Wow, Fish, thanks for the warning. I don't suppose I should ask your opinion of Eragon either  ;)
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Parker on March 02, 2006, 12:21:34 PM
I read Thief Lord, another Funke book, and I also found it to be slow moving and rather silly.  I wonder if it's like that in the original German?
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Shrain on March 02, 2006, 01:14:17 PM
Hum. Makes me wonder how "good" the Spanish ed. of ELANTRIS is. I mean, how well could/did the translator actually capture EUOL's prose??
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Entsuropi on March 02, 2006, 02:07:59 PM
Eragon sucks and my blood boils at it's merest mention. SUPER ENT SMASH
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: JenaRey on March 02, 2006, 02:18:44 PM
Totally agreed Ent.  My housemate loaned it to me and after the first twenty pages I took it back down into the basement and threw it at her, gently, but still...yuck.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: House of Mustard on March 02, 2006, 02:22:34 PM
Weird.  My wife is reading Inkheart right now and raving about it.

I wonder, though: she never reads any fantasy -- I wonder if this book appeals less to the fantasy crowd and more to the mainstream (for lack of a better word).  Or maybe my wife just has bad taste in books.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Fellfrosch on March 02, 2006, 02:46:48 PM
Well she likes yours, so we've all suspected it.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: stacer on March 02, 2006, 02:58:28 PM
I think this is the general feeling among children's fantasy people--that those who don't know fantasy are the ones who rave about the books that hit it big and are plain and derivative (e.g., Eragon). Inkheart isn't derivative so much as too much in love with books to have a real plot.

Quote
I found that once I’d put the book down, I had little to no desire to pick it back up again. I just didn’t care enough to find out what happened next, and I was never really worried that things wouldn’t work out in the end.


This is exactly what happened to me. I loved The Thief Lord, minus the truly annoying fact that it really shouldn't be fantasy, because the only fantasy in it was the deus ex machina ending, but I bought Inkheart thinking it'd be better, and because all my classmates and teachers were raving about it. I think I got up to about chapter 5, and never went back to it.

However, Cornelia Funke herself is a very engaging and knowledgable speaker. She really knows children's books and how to teach others about writing--she came to my school and I really enjoyed hearing her speak. So, perhaps part of the raving is because people who meet her like her so much.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Fellfrosch on March 02, 2006, 03:20:39 PM
When I get published I'll be callous and abrasive, to weed out that kind of crap.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: House of Mustard on March 02, 2006, 03:26:12 PM
Wait Fell -- so have you already been published?
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Fellfrosch on March 02, 2006, 03:29:28 PM
The Man can't take what I'm puttin' down.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Entsuropi on March 02, 2006, 03:47:28 PM
Nothing says 'pillock' louder than a net-nerd using ghetto or urban slang :D
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Skar on March 02, 2006, 04:31:51 PM
Wait...what's a pillock?
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Entsuropi on March 02, 2006, 07:50:04 PM
Brit insult. Means 'stuffy idiot', i guess. ;)
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Skar on March 02, 2006, 07:59:15 PM
Ah.  That's a good one. I'll have to remember to use it.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: MsFish on March 03, 2006, 02:57:15 AM
There's a Geek Girl involving Eragon to come.  It might not be what you think, though.  
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Nessa on March 03, 2006, 11:11:55 AM
Just finished reading "Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West" by Gregory Maguire and I'm going to rank this 'adult' fiction among those which mainstream readers like, but speculative fiction readers don't. It's an OK book, fun and entertaining, even. But there's all sorts of plot holes and poor writing for this genre. It was disappointing.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers on March 03, 2006, 12:13:18 PM
They did a play of that. It's $100 a seat for tickets.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Nessa on March 03, 2006, 12:17:46 PM
Yeah, it's on Broadway. It's done tours and everything.  It's likely popular because it's raunchy and not because it's a great work of literature.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Parker on March 03, 2006, 12:18:26 PM
And the musical was durned good, too.  Haven't read the book yet, though it checks out like hotcakes at the library.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Nessa on March 03, 2006, 12:35:49 PM
Also, my haranguing has nothing to do with the fact that the author stole my name. (A main character is named "Nessarose" nick "Nessa".)

I promise it doesn't.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Parker on March 03, 2006, 01:56:52 PM
Was the bit about being raunchy aimed at the musical or the book?  I didn't find the musical raunchy at all.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: MsFish on March 03, 2006, 02:15:43 PM
The musical isn't raunchy at all.  In fact, it's one of the best musicals in years.  But I hear the book is pretty...graphic.  Which is why I haven't ever read it.  
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Parker on March 03, 2006, 03:12:57 PM
Ah.  I hadn't heard that about the book.  It surprises me then that it's checking out so well in Utah County.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Skar on March 03, 2006, 03:24:12 PM
It doesn't surprise me.  Repression is a terrible thing.   ;D
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Nessa on March 03, 2006, 03:38:22 PM
Quote
Was the bit about being raunchy aimed at the musical or the book?  I didn't find the musical raunchy at all.

If the sex were any more detailed in the book it could rank down there with Harlequin (I hate to admit it, but I've read one of those Harlequin "Luna" imprint fantasy books and it was gross and awful). There's serveral adulturous relationships (almost condoned), a sex show that doesn't figure at all into the plot, and plenty of talking about sex. It was just obnoxious and detracted from the book.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: Spriggan on March 03, 2006, 08:13:00 PM
My sister and her roommates at Ricks love the musical, they all saw it when then went to NYC this past January.
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: allie_gurl on April 13, 2006, 06:24:57 PM
oooo I find inkheart is the second best book!!(the first is inkspell-the sequel)Its a mixture of fantasy, action, friendship...I just cant wait to see the movie... :D
Title: Re: Review: Inkheart
Post by: lehea on January 01, 2007, 11:31:22 PM
I've read Inkheart and it's sequel Inkspell.  Both are really good must-reads if you have not read them and you like Cornelia Funke... or even if you haven't heard of her.  I read Dragon Rider and got hooked on her writing style, she's one of the best authors.