Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cjhuitt

Pages: 1 2 [3]
31
I'm a bit late getting to this one.  Others have expressed most of my impressions, so I'll just use their words where I can.

You're writing from an alien POV, but it reads like it's human. I can only assume the Alliance crew and commander are human – if they're not you should say what they are instead.

I agree with pretty much hubay's entire paragraph on this.  It was my first thought as I was reading it.  Examples include how he describes the fighting the commander would once have seen (as a human would have seen it), and the commander's age as well past his prime at 67.  (And what sort of years is he 67 in?  Are Dalcon's years that he learned as a child the same as what we would use to measure?)

Shoot, this was a minor viewpoint? I enjoyed it, so if you can bring more of his POV, I'll be happy.

I agree with this and generally all of akoebel's other points.

The second paragraph didn't work for me. We already know the situation, so I didn't feel I needed the history of the library stations. This guy is going to inspect why some station didn't communicate, period. I don't need any more than this.

In addition to this, I don't understand the reasoning behind having libraries in dedicated, remote space stations.  It seems like it would make more sense to have them local to populations.  You mention there were concerns, and what possible benefits could there be to overcome the concerns?

The high admiral went on a simple reconnaissance mission. This is really quite a stretch, even with the fact that one of his relatives lived here. People this high are mainly bureaucrats who never see a day of action. For one of them to leave the high command and go on a simple mission like this is highly improbable.

He doesn't act like (what I think of as) a commander, either, let alone a supreme commander.  Dalcon never thinks of him as a figurehead or incompetent, so I would expect someone who is a supreme commander of anything to be quite competent.  For one thing, most of the bridge crew doesn't use a form of address with him.  Perhaps that's because he's not captain, but I would expect some honorific.  Plus, they seem to respond to commands from him, as well as the captain.

I don't know how long the trip took, but given that they were fretting over the three-week delay before anyone noticed anything wrong, I assume it's a little while.  Given that, a moderately competent commander would have had contingency plans for the likeliest scenarios, and probably variations of them, discussed with their staff.  Dalcon would probably have even been included or told about the plans, if he was going to accompany the troops in any of them.  If there was much chance of action, the tension should have been higher among the other crew - shorter sentences, etc.  The commander or captain could have relayed a lot of information quickly by saying "Plan Gamma-3" instead of spelling out exactly what to do.  This happens 1) when they approach and scan (the sensor section shouldn't even need to be told to scan then; it should have been the first thing the commander set in place when the trip was planned) 2) when the commander gives docking instructions, 3) when the commander briefs the troops, and 4) when the commander details objectives for the troops inside the station.  Heading to the library might have been too far out to contingency plan, however, so there it starts making sense.

Note that we can still get the key pieces of information through straight narrative here; it's the pacing of the dialog that I think kills any tension or flow that I personally would like to see for the section.

Also, a side-note to the scanning: What is the range for scanning, and what is the range for exiting hyperspace?  You'd better know them in this situation, and what both entail for tactics in a case like this.  For example, most hyperspace scenarios have limits imposed by gravity.  However, a space station can really be placed anywhere, and I didn't see any mention of a star, so they might have been able to come out of hyperspace right on top of the station (figuratively speaking).  Besides, the information about scheduled calls implies a faster-than-light communication, which usually means a very large sensor range as well (not always, but usually).  Combine these two, and it would probably make more sense to come in as close to the station as possible, immediately scan, and implement one of the pre-planned scenarios nearly instantly.  This minimizes any opponent's chance to react, which is usually considered a good thing. ;)

Dalcon forgot his gun.

This jumped way out at me.  How did he ever get to be above the rank of restroom-cleaner if he forgets to bring one of his weapons?  Or if it is so unimportant, why would he even think about it at all?

Regarding the helmet, as well:  His spaceship had to be modified to accommodate his horns.  How likely is it a helmet would really make him blend in with the others?  I don't think it likely at all.

The admiral leads the away team (part 2) : this time, we get a mild question asking it it's wise. A good officer shouldn't have asked, he should have put the foolish bureaucrat in the next lift and left the pros do the work.

Here I actually recall Dalcon asking, but the major point stands that other officers should have nicely kept him too busy to leave the ship, let alone go down the elevator first.  This gave you a fine chance to add character or world-build that I think you missed, however.  If it is a cultural thing that he needs to lead, and none of his own crew questioned him leading, that to me implies a culture where asking if he should not go first is like asking if you're too old and decrepit to contribute anything.  I would expect the commander to get angry or upset at the insinuation, which would add some tension to a scene that I felt was really lacking it.

Now, my biggest issue : the trodoon took great pains to make it look like this was done by random bandits, yet they left 70 witnesses ready to tell everything? In the same area, they killed the technicians so the transmitter wouldn't be repaired, but didn't even think the scholars could do it? Someone could have had a hobby. Given what we know of Trodoons, they shouldn't have had qualms killing 70 scholars when they already disposed of the technicians.

Darkclaw's reason was that if he killed everyone on the station, the attack would look more like a professional attack, and would garner more attention, possibly leading to a full-on hunt for the perpetrators, rather than simple patrols-which could spell disaster if they're discovered before they are ready.

This doesn't make any sense to me.  Now, they're aliens, so they're expected to think it strange ways, so it might work.  Tactically, though, why try a subterfuge while leaving 70 or so intelligent beings who saw you plan the subterfuge?  Unless it comes up later as a misdirection or distraction, it makes no sense at all.  On the other hand, if they all disappeared (except for the bodies of the guards, maybe?) it might be more likely to look like piracy/slavery (if any underground or black-market slave trade exists in your galaxy).   That would also give Darkclaw a continuing source of information well beyond what he might get from even the most comprehensive library.

Also, he was of the opinion that none in the Galactic Alliance would feel there was any major threat- it's not the first thing most would assume, and it's not like he monologued about his plans to the people.

If he didn't monologue about his plans to his people, he's the first commander I've read (from an admittedly small sample of 2 chapters) who didn't.  I brought this up in the last time, and you gave the credible answer that the High Lord (IIRC) liked to pontificate and explain himself to his juniors.  That's fine, but here we have another commander who seems to take every chance he can to explain, in detail, exactly why he's ordering what he does.  And Dalcon isn't much better when he gets to talk, although it is more to the point, and could also be explained/improved by making it a diction thing for him.

One thing I forgot to mention yesterday : I found some word repetitions throughout the text (for instance, 'investigation' in the middle of page 2).

I also noted a lot of these, and not just investigation.  Going from memory, there were 3 or 4 places where the same word was used multiple times in a paragraph to say the same thing.  I'm pretty sure most of those repetitions could be cut through some wordsmithing, although this might not be the wordsmithing stage for your story.

Other things I thought:

* Any significance to Information Station Alpha (i.e. the first one)?

* Dalcon "would not believe that" the Lead Scion would... Since this is in Dalcon's POV, his belief is implied.  I think this weakens the connection with Dalcon that was established right at the beginning of that paragraph.

* Supreme Commander Garek mentions that if it were left to higher-ups, he might not be investigating yet.  How much higher can you get above Supreme Commander?  That seemed odd.

* Would Dalcon be so forthcoming as to both admit their information network is usually so good, and that they had a failing this time?  Especially to what appears to be a competitor?

* Is Dalcon's power related to the water he sips?  That's how it reads to me.  I assume all the Scion's powers are similar.

* Airlock doors are strong!  Even if Dalcon has super-human strength, he shouldn't be able to easily open one.

* How well can Dalcon differentiate between humans?  Can he see/smell/hear/sense the relationship between the old lecturer and the supreme commander?  If so, he should probably recognize it in text.

* Uncle apparently recognized Supreme Commander Garek even under his helmet.

* The discussion in the room with Uncle was too anticlimactic.  To me, Dalcon seems to just accept that this scholar knows how to interpret military intentions, etc.  Also, it cuts the Uncle out of the conversation incredibly quickly, especially since Dalcon wanted to beat some answers out of him.  Finally, to me it seemed obvious Dalcon was setting himself up for some kind of quest to find this information, but that may be solvable with a bit of polish.

* Why did Dalcon want to beat information out of the Uncle?  Is it a tendency for his race?  Is it a result of all the power he built up and is (presumably) still holding?  And what happens to that power?

32
Reading Excuses / Re: Email List + Submission Dates
« on: July 13, 2011, 01:10:29 AM »
I'm jumping in early here, but I should have another chapter ready on Monday.

33
Reading Excuses / Re: 2011 Jul 4 - cjhuitt - Second Son
« on: July 13, 2011, 01:09:32 AM »
akoebel, Will777r: thanks for the feedback (late is fine, and really, a week isn't that late).

I'm glad to hear that the sibling conversation works well.  I liked it, but it was the first three-person interspersed conversation (as opposed to only two people) I recall ever writing, so it took a bit of work to figure out.

Are his teachers so mean (or stupid) as to actually schedule overlapping sessions (and in different places?) or is it just the skewed view of a teenager? I would expect tutors for a prince to actually come to the prince's room to do their lessons, instead of having the prince run around.

To answer the first, some of both, for reasons discussed later in the book.  I don't want to reveal too much just yet, but I am curious if it was too distracting, or just a question you wondered about.

In a similar vein, does the queen actually ask him to scrub floors?

This queen, yes.  I hope this is brought out later, but this one I'm less sure I've covered appropriately.  However, she's raising her children to have experienced what work others do, from the opinion that understanding it will make them better leaders.

I also found the initial scene with his tutor unnecessary. My guess is that there is some foreshadowing in the opening line? But I don't know if the entire scene makes it worth it. I can't speak much on first sentence hooks cause I'm horrid at them, but I can say that if your story opens with the first line of scene 2 ("Miki ran down the empty corridor"), I am definitely more drawn in. That at least makes me want to find out why he's running and why he's trying to keep quiet :)

The first line was supposed to be foreshadowing, but I'm not sure how much of it will end up being kept -- that may be a case of changing it later for better foreshadowing.

It's interesting that you mention the second scene as being a better starting point.  I had started there originally, and the feedback from my first readers was that that scene introduced too many characters and world elements at once, similar to your next point of feedback.  So I added this scene, took advantage of the tutor to add a rough sketch of foreshadowing, and let there be a scene focused mostly on Miki before it blossomed with others.  After this feedback, however, I'm not sure the scene I chose is the best one to do it, and there might be another that would work as well without some of the problems this one entails.

Your link looks interesting.  I'll give it a more thorough perusal as soon as I find the time.


34
Reading Excuses / Re: 2011 Jul 4 - cjhuitt - Second Son
« on: July 06, 2011, 01:03:39 AM »
Welcome to Reading Excuses.

Thanks, and thanks for the feedback.

The way the ambassador is immediately given an audience before the queen and her entire family reads counter intuitive – usually royalty lets (surprise) visitors wait or at least let minor functionaries take care of the issue first. The queen shouldn't be at the beck and call of every visiting dignitary, it makes her appear weak. In this case the ambassador is also from an unimportant country with which Miki’s country hasn't had any important or serious dealings in years. For a message no one knows is coming drumming out the queen herself seems excessive.

This is why I love critique group readers.  It completely never occurred to me to consider this.  Fortunately I don't think it will make me significantly change later chapters (this time), but I'll have to put in some thought to either change it, or explain it better.  I like to think that someday I won't be as blindsided by some of these things, but it'll probably just change to different things anyway.

Writing wise you’ve got some passages that, while not strictly passive voice, do lend a passive tone to the chapter. [...] I’m talking about things like “had always thought”, “had trained herself”, “had seen”, “was wearing”, “was watching”.

A bad habit of mine, and one I thought I had excised from this chapter.  It's probably time to take another look at my next few, as well.

Thanks again.

35
Initially, I wrote him as really unreliable : he has things to hide that I didn't reveal until mid book. I understand it's a little untenable with a POV character, so I'm rewriting him to share more of his secrets. I still haven't told you all of them, hence the "consequences" part. If you feel I should reveal more, I'm open to suggestions.

Personally, I usually don't like that.  I gather others people in general find it off-putting also.  However, if you need to have it, I have a couple of suggestions.  One is to show the consequences that are most important to Onmk, which may not be the ones that hit hardest with the reader.  For example, if something bad at work potentially causes 10,000 people to lose their jobs, and as a result mine is one of them... then sure, I'll be sad about the other people, but mostly upset about the consequence to me.  The other option is to hang a lantern on it somehow, so it doesn't feel like it's just an authorial oversight or vagueness, which is how it reads to me now.

@cjhuitt : In fact, the entity Onmk was extracted from Ciera's memories. He experienced all she experienced for the last 15 years, so he knows her really well. On the other hand, he has a mind of his own and doesn't understand all that she does or feel. For the POV problems you felt, some of them might stem from his intimate knowledge of her. In other instances, I may have slipped. I'll check them out.
[...]
For Onmk's change of attitude, he doesn't have much of a choice. He has to back down or she'll never do what he asks.

Part of what read oddly to me was his behavior.  He supposedly knows her so well, and yet he is completely unable to use that knowledge to get her to do what he wants.  He could remind her of every time she did something other than return stuff that ended up badly.  He could make emotional pleas, he could do whatever.  Instead, he tries to argue her into it, with no indication that the arguing works well other than a passing reference to the Memories.  She certainly doesn't act like arguing works well.

You might be able to improve this by emphasizing either how little he remembers, or how old it was, or something.  Possibly more reinforcement of how flighty he -- oooh, shiny!

Ahem.  Or, it might be better portrayed with the previous chapters, which again I have missed.

As a side-note, I felt like Ciera gave up her anger too quickly when showing it to someone else was mentioned.

His mentioning of the cipher was a very dumb mistake on his part, he should have realized it would backfire on him.

In general, I like mistakes, and if his nature makes him quickly changeable, then this fits right in.

@hubay...
For your suggestion, I'll try to have a short viewpoint of him sooner. I might have to break my 1 chapter = 1 POV structure to do it, but it might work better. Thanks for mentioning it!

My thoughts on this: Structure is nice, but don't let it get in the way of a good story.  Also, this is a great time to put it in and see how it works.  If you figure out it's needed, then you can figure out how to structure it.  If it isn't needed, well, the problem rather solves itself.

36
Reading Excuses / 2011 Jul 4 - cjhuitt - Second Son
« on: July 05, 2011, 02:01:56 AM »
This is the first chapter in a fantasy novel.  My working title is Second Son, which is nicely generic and doesn't say much.

In this chapter, we meet our first main Character, Prince Mikhail (Miki).  He is summoned to join his family in meeting the Antuskian ambassador, who proposes an betrothal between his older brother Promhail and a princess of their land.

37
Hurrah!  One in which I've read at least one previous chapter.

I'm going to start with a very minor nitpick -- at the start of paragraph 3, "acolyte's" shouldn't be possessive.

Speaking of acolytes, I'm uncertain as to what is expected from their behavior.  Again, this may have been covered by previous chapters, or it may just be the worldbuilding you've done contrasting with my usual expectations, which isn't necessarily a bad thing as long as it's consistent.  That said, in the third paragraph Albione refers to acolytes thinking discipline would make him an early riser.  Would acolytes think this?  Or more importantly, even if they thought it amongst themselves, would they change their behavior to their (presumably) superiors?  This is also shown a bit later on, when the acolyte that delivered the package to Albione sighs when Albione questions him.  To me, that doesn't seem like something one would do to their superior.  This might be explained by an increasingly negative opinion of Albione himself, but if so you might need to provide some contrast and support; acolytes being helpful to others and resisting or ignoring Albione would be one way.

One sentence, of confusing form, the Yoda Arrangement, appeared in the text.  OK, more seriously at one point Albione is thinking of the painting of his family emblem, the sentence describing it was really confusing to me.  "One, of his family emblem, the Silver Gauntlet, hung on the opposite wall."  I had to read it a few times to parse what was being said, then I couldn't help myself but to make a comment in similar form to refer to it.

How much information about the murder of Albione's parents to we need to know?  I'm not suggesting taking any of it out, exactly, but wanted to make sure that it plays a part in the story, and particularly here.  Looking just at this scene, when he's thinking of his parents, it might be more effective to just refer to their untimely death instead of providing more details.  On the other hand, if the information helps drive Albione's actions later, or is even more important somehow, it's good to get a glimpse of it early, and we're still early enough in the story to absorb background information as needed.

Justicars.  I assume there are rumors about them and how they work.  That said, Albione seems very certain about what happens when Justicars get involved.  If the people just disappear, however, how does he know what interactions they have with the Justicar beforehand?  Albione may fear that this is what is happening, but it is written as if he knows for a fact that is how they do things.

After reading the note, Albione thinks that this is how his temple service will come to an end.  To me, this overboard unless supported by previous chapters.  Would merely getting an invitation to a banquet of honor, or receiving a horn trophy that he had not sought, be enough to have him removed from the temple?  Surely his superiors wouldn't punish someone quite so severely for another's actions, even if his own had enabled them.  It especially seems overboard to me in that he has the option he immediately takes, of showing it to his superiors and explaining that he didn't seek it and doesn't plan on going.  I think it would be more effective to detail the specific punishments he might be likely to receive.  Especially if he then decides to show it to Brother Pate not to avoid the punishments, which he might decide he could live with anyway, but because he believes it his duty to expose the agents in the temple.

(As an aside, it would be great if for some other, more important reason, he ended up at that dinner anyway.  It'll be tough with a vow of seclusion, but make his life horribly harder after.)

In Brother Pate's office, Albione says "I did not solicit this Superior".  I was initially confused what Superior referred to, thinking it might be a class of invitation to banquets of honor, or the horn, before I realized it was addressing his comments to Brother Pate.

Brother Page laughing doesn't seem to be in the same character as I recall in the previous chapter.  Of course, maybe the previous one had him more severe than earlier in the book, due to the necessity of punishing Albione.

When with his superiors -- and I haven't really seen him with his peers much yet -- Albione sure isn't very talkative.  Many times you refer to his mind going blank, or words deserting him.  You might want to use different phrases, or just cut out some of the specific references and have pauses in the other person's speech.  I get the impression that Albione is overwhelmed to the point of not being able to do anything when he is with superiors, and I doubt that's the impression you want, although it might be.

Also during dialog, and especially with Brother Pate, you have a lot of minor movements scattered throughout the dialog.  Individually, all of them read just fine, but taken together I wonder if some could be removed, and trust to the reader to supply natural motions along with the dialog.  You'd want to leave some especially characteristic ones, and those that have a bearing on the dialog or scene, but many of them didn't seem to do so.  Here, while talking, Brother Pate:
Quote
frowned, set the letter down, raised an eyebrow and laughed, placed the letter under a stack of other documents and stood, narrowed his eyes, walked around the desk and crossed his legs while he leaned on it, held Albione's gaze and shook his head, frowned and leaned back against the desk again, stepped to Albione's side and crossed his arms, walked back to his desk and selected a quill pen, smiled at Albione, scrunched his face and squinted at Albione, and sat in his chair and cleared his throat.
  He also:
Quote
turned his face to stone and held up the letter, leaned closer to Albione, pointed the pen at Albione, and wrote on the blank paper he had placed in front of him.
  To me, the last set conveys more about the scene and story than the first set does.

Things I think could be good foreshadowing: Albione forced to decide to heal a night elf for some reason, Albione forced to break his vow of seclusion for some reason, and bad things happening during Albione's seclusion period (since he interpreted Rook-Sha as saying it will go well, when she said it will be more successful than he thinks).

The middle section, with Brother Pate talking to Ernan.  I wondered how much of it was truly necessary.  It's kind of nice to see that they've got their own plans for Albione, but it might introduce more tension otherwise.  I guess it's hard to saw without reading the rest of the story.

The last bit of the middle section confused me.  It seems as if they thought his nobility was a bad thing, or a cause to make him defect, when it seems like it was a family tradition to be in the temple.

In the last section, summaries usually arrive rather that come, unless they can move on their own.  Also, how seriously did Albione want stories and songs of his exploits?  If he was serious, he should probably be less dismayed than he is.  If he daydreamed about it, however, I would expect a different word than wanted.  Or a softening, like he thought he wanted.

Is Albione used to fancy settings and fragrances?  If not, they would probably emphasize the unusualness of where he is, rather than make him relax.  Unless there's a little added something to the incense.

Charom taking him through Rook-Sha's quarters:  Are the couches important?  If not, they seem an odd detail to note.  Also, Charom pauses in front of an open hallway to announce that Rook-Sha usually receives visitors here, which to me means the open hallway, which would be odd.

You describe specifics of what is on the table before saying it all blurred together for Albione.  If that is the case, you might emphasize one aspect of it, like the colors, while leaving out the forms and identifications.  Otherwise, it makes it seem like he was suddenly overcome by something.

Two servants enter to serve food, but only one does anything before they leave.

Why does the table appear larger?  Is it actually larger than it first appeared?  Or is he feeling the effects of some sort of soporific that is making his senses wacky?

Finally, I'm left wondering if everything the Mouth of Alazon says is actually true, or if that's Albione's cultural thoughts.  It could be both, of course, which would be even more fun.  By this point I really look forward to things going wrong during his seclusion.

38
As is traditional so far, I give warning that I've only read this chapter and not previous ones.  Please bear with me, this might get long as I describe where I'm talking about things.

One of the main things I noticed when reading was about the sentence construction.  For one, there are a lot of "was <verb>ing" and "were <verbing>" sentences.  These can almost always be replaced with <verb>ed.  For example, "Onmk's senses were still reeling" could be "Onmk's senses still reeled".  (This may not be the best place to change, but it is an early example of what could be changed.)  Changing these often makes the text quicker to read, both in a slightly more straightforward way to interpret the sentence and in the fact that it reduces the number of words to read.

This may be because I haven't read the previous chapters, but I was quite lost in Onmk and Ciera's relationship.  Early references to Memories hint that I'm missing something.  However, at various times he acts like he knows her completely (she always felt belittled by her short stature, these days she wore her hair..., she was always difficult, strong-arming her always worked well, a friend of fifteen years), and at others like he barely knows her at all (looks at her face "like for the first time", she tells him her age, he tries to manipulate her as if he has barely any idea what she's like, he doesn't appear to know about Ciera's adversarial relationship with Denalia).

Is this is third-person limited?   There are a couple of places where, despite being in Onmk's viewpoint, we get information about what others are feeling (Ciera always felt belittled by her height, Ciera looked at him amazed, Denalia looks eighty years old but is stated to be sixty).  They aren't major, but they did stand out to me.

Ciera's description included a twinkle of "malicious" light when she thought.  First of all, this means she's mean when she thinks?  Second, at the end of the chapter her eyes start to twinkle when Denalia is picking on her.  Was this supposed to be her thinking evil thoughts about Denalia?

There are places where things are repeated or alluded to that seem redundant.  Some examples are Ciera putting dangling wisps of hair back behind her ears "each time they got back before her eyes", Onmk telling Ciera she doesn't know these women when describing them to her, and a number of the dialog attributions.  The dialog attributions are especially true when the dialog is in a paragraph that the speaker does some other action as well.

There are places where much is just stated generally instead of given in details.  Examples are Onmk thinking Ciera is always difficult and needed to be argued into doing anything, Onmk not being able to tell her she couldn't read the Compendium pages yet (although that might have been done in earlier chapters), and "something" passing over Ciera's face when she talks about the lead documentalist.

I like that there's a time limit -- only a couple of days at most.  However, right after that Onmk gives Ciera a hint to trying to read the book: that it's in a cipher.  If she feels compelled to try and read the book, two days is no time at all to try to decode a cipher.  Even if that was all you were doing.  Right after this, Ciera decides to investigate it more tomorrow morning, so they're already losing up to one day there.  It doesn't seem like the two day time limit is very pressing on him.

When Onmk is deciding he needs Ciera's trust, he doesn't want to contemplate the consequences of failure.  The readers, however, do want to know what's at stake, or at least some potential downside.  If you covered that in earlier chapters, great.  Otherwise, here might be a good time for it.

A few of sentences didn't make sense to me.  One was Onmk with the books, especially "Turning his gaze inside...".  That part was the confusing portion of that sentence.  The second was Denalia asking of Ciera "What did you do?  Stamp them over to..."  The third was near the end of the chapter, when Ciera says "Can you stop this, please?"  I didn't have any idea what Onmk was supposed to be stopping.  Especially since she goes on to talk about hitting Denalia.

Does Ciera's constant chatter cause Onmk to be depressed?  At the beginning of the last section, despite her chatter, he felt confident.  In that same paragraph, it seems like a very tenuous plan -- make Ciera happy so she's more amenable to his arguments -- but that may be just in line with Onmk's character.

39
Reading Excuses / Re: Email List + Submission Dates
« on: July 03, 2011, 12:44:00 AM »
I'll throw my hat into the ring for this coming week, if it's not already too late.

Just to be clear, it's around 4000 words, right?

40

Taking the call is not quite the same thing, since as you said, Darkclaw knows what the call will be about, which is directly related to the High Lord's commands. Though I could change it a bit, make the High Lord know that they have arrived before Darkclaw can answer the call if you think that would work better.


It may be an annoyance of mine carrying over from work, where people seem to feel obligated to talk to whoever is calling on the cell phone right this minute, instead of everyone else in the meeting they are will.  As I said, my best analogy would be to a general or cabinet member in a briefing meeting with the President in the U.S.  Certainly, an alien race -- especially one that, as you've described in these comments, lacks emotion -- is likely to develop different customs.  Maybe to them it's entirely logical and appropriate to do so.


I'm not quite sure what you meant by Keeneye questioning orders. The only thing he did was ask if the station was safe. At this point the other Troodons don't know anything about where they are, so it's not questioning an order, rather seeking more information on the situation.

I get what you're saying about Darkclaw's mode of command, but at this point most of what he does is relay information from the High Lord. Also the lack of emotion might lead him to not sound like a typical military officer.


I think the Keeneye part was, for me, the culmination.  Again remembering that I haven't seen the previous chapters (and I may take up the offers for previous parts, but right now I don't have the time to get through them), Darkclaw started strong: "I will be informed".  Part way through he seems more casual in reply, then when he get's to Keeneye I read it as a Darkclaw is expected to continue, and Keeneye is questioning if it is safe, which implies Darkclaw's desire/command to continue isn't a good one.  If they are emotionless, then it is probably fine to do so.

All that said, given that you've told me in this that Keeneye knows nothing about where they are going it makes more sense.  I didn't get that impression from the section I read, but again perhaps it was covered earlier.  It can sometimes be difficult to remember not all members of a group know what the viewpoint character does, but I read into the part where he had commands sent that the necessary briefing information was also sent. 

41
Reading Excuses / Re: June 24 – Hubay, Lord Domestic Ch12
« on: June 24, 2011, 03:41:59 AM »
Fair warning, I haven't read the previous chapters.

I liked the officers feeling superior due to the way they get drunk.

After Jhuz sends the officers out, Zaisha and Ezlio stay, and one of them talks about Falcons.  It may be that it's obvious to someone who has read the previous chapters, but I didn't know who was speaking there.

After he starts talking with Zaisha, Jhuz "sat down on the air."  Is that a typo, or something I'm missing from earlier?

Other than that, I think it read very well.  Of course, I may be missing a huge tone shift or something -- how would I know?  Still, enjoyable on its own.

42
Be warned, I'm reading this chapter without the benefit of the previous ones.

Is Albione speaking out loud to the portrait, or thinking it?  What would happen if he was heard speaking that out loud?

The displeasure in Brother Pate's eyes could stand alone, instead of stating Albione would be punished.  We find that out soon enough anyway.

There is a lot of interweaving of Brother Pate's dialog with Albione's actions and reactions.  I think it might be more effective to concentrate the condemnation, and get the most important reaction (or two) from Albione.

Was the writing at the bottom of the page Albione's penance and the stamp some other matter, or the other way around?  That part confused me, at least partially because the proximity of the stamping to the penance in the text makes me think the stamp dictated the penance.  If that's the case, is tearing old doors apart a common enough penance to need a stamp?

Speaking of penances, Albione thinks this one would fall to young acolytes.  How young are they when they would do this penance?  (Later one is mentioned as not more than twelve.)  I read it as basically tearing a door apart, albeit an older door.  It's believable to have a grown man and warrior do so, maybe, if they aren't the grand entrance doors I envisioned.  The ones I envisioned could be torn down with great effort by a man, or with some effort by a man using magic.  I'm not sure that it would be something routinely given to boys, even if removing old doors is common enough for it to be routine.

What footwear does Albione use, if any?  Boots are mentioned later.  If he does much without wearing them, or wears them without socks, the prayer beads might not be as painful as depicted.  Annoying, yes, but unless they are really prayer caltrops, probably not a jolt.  He's probably got some good calluses built up by now.

There's no need to mention Brother Pate again as the instigator of this next duty.  I still remember who assigned the penances, and if he's still doing an acolyte's task, it's still a penance.  Even if it has some good reasoning behind it.

The High Priestess goes through the first three names very quickly, if their families are going to walk up and receive a medal as demonstrated by Sir Ronar's wife and children.

What do Sir Ronar's children look like.  Does the boy resemble his father?  Maybe the daughter?  Something to drive a bit more sorrow into Albione, perhaps.

When he got to bed you mention no light spilled from the room.  Wouldn't light go into it from the hallway?

I think you could make the last line more effective to end on a nice punch.

43
I should preface this by saying I'm coming at this chapter cold.  I haven't read the previous four.

Is there a difference between standard minutes and other minutes?  At the start, five minutes until the destination is announced.  At the bottom of that page, Darkclaw is told ten minutes until arrival.

I wonder how much of the first two paragraphs are necessary.  It's hard to say until further into the story.

On the second page, you say the throne room's majesty befits the High Lord, but it's barely described.  Was it described earlier?  Even if so, some more details would help here.

If the High Lord can read Darkclaw's mind, why did he need to announce the imminent arrival?  Also, the High Lord does a lot of explaining.  From the ambiance, I kind of expected more ordering and less explaining -- or possibly explaining after the fact.

The explaining actually seems to be a pandemic among the characters in charge in this chapter.

Would Darkclaw take a comm message in the High Lord's chamber?  Isn't that kind of like taking a cell call in the middle of a meeting with the president?  Besides that, Darkclaw should be able to discern the purpose of the call without taking it, since he had ordered it.

Nitpick: "A split second later, the High Lord vanished."  This could just be "The High Lord vanished", or even "He vanished" if you use pronouns for the High Lord.

Darkclaw seems to be in charge of things, but it doesn't read much like a military to me, or even like he's a ship captain, despite giving orders.  At the top of page 5 (in my program),  Darkclaw nods to the officer who executes his command.  Also, Praetor Keeneye questions his orders as soon as they meet.  Darkclaw doesn't react as I would expect a superior, but more as a teacher or priest, explaining how things will work.

Being given a mental map to get through the station was nice.

Do you want to know spelling errors?  At one point you use "moths" instead of "months".

Darkclaw is to collect genetic material, but not his own.  I assume this is for the clones, but it comes after the instructions for what the clones will do, which is a little confusing for me.  The specific instructions for Darkclaw to not use his own genetic material make me wonder and speculate as to why, and what could go wrong.  That's a nice touch.

44
Reading Excuses / Re: Your Background
« on: June 11, 2011, 12:43:00 AM »
My name's Caleb.  I'm in my 30s, and a computer programmer by day.  Lately I've started writing again (it's cheaper than WoW).  So far most of my writing has been fantasy.  I enjoy most types of sci-fi and fantasy in varying doses.

This will be my first attempt at an online critique group.  I hope it works out.

Pages: 1 2 [3]