Author Topic: BrandonSanderson.com  (Read 23950 times)

Gemm: Rock & Roll Star; Born to Rock

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4591
  • Fell Points: 0
  • I Am Your Worst Nightmare's Dream
    • View Profile
    • Perfect
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #90 on: July 16, 2004, 08:08:20 PM »
Can I suggest making the news blurb bar a bit wider? The size of it just somewhat affends me.
“NOTHING IS TRUE. EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED.”
                William S. Burroughs

“Who needs girls when you’ve got comics?”
                Grant Morrison’s Flex Mentallo

Spriggan

  • Administrator
  • Level 78
  • *****
  • Posts: 10582
  • Fell Points: 31
  • Yes, I am this awesome
    • View Profile
    • Legacies Lost
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #91 on: July 16, 2004, 10:54:45 PM »
What screen resolution are you useing Gemm?  I think that might be your problem.  Since this site is designed as a commercial/info site that has to reach a wide audience we designed it for lower resolutions.
Screw it, I'm buying crayons and paper. I can imagineer my own adventures! Wheeee!

Chuck Norris is the reason Waldo is hiding.


Gemm: Rock & Roll Star; Born to Rock

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4591
  • Fell Points: 0
  • I Am Your Worst Nightmare's Dream
    • View Profile
    • Perfect
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #92 on: July 17, 2004, 12:25:59 AM »
1280x1024 and 1024x768.
“NOTHING IS TRUE. EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED.”
                William S. Burroughs

“Who needs girls when you’ve got comics?”
                Grant Morrison’s Flex Mentallo

Spriggan

  • Administrator
  • Level 78
  • *****
  • Posts: 10582
  • Fell Points: 31
  • Yes, I am this awesome
    • View Profile
    • Legacies Lost
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #93 on: July 17, 2004, 01:23:39 AM »
on 1280x1024 it'll look small less then 10% (6% in the month of June) of all the people with PCs use that resolution so there reason to design for it.  I use 1024x768 and it looks just fine to me so that's probaly a personal prefrence and on 800x600 it'll look a tad to big.  We had to take into account that people do use other resolutions but there had to be a balence so it looked good on all 3.  If we made them larger it would be very difficult to navigate on a 800x600 resolution which is still a very common resolution (almost 40%).

http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2004/June/res.php
Screw it, I'm buying crayons and paper. I can imagineer my own adventures! Wheeee!

Chuck Norris is the reason Waldo is hiding.


Gemm: Rock & Roll Star; Born to Rock

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4591
  • Fell Points: 0
  • I Am Your Worst Nightmare's Dream
    • View Profile
    • Perfect
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #94 on: July 18, 2004, 02:01:12 PM »
Hmmmm, well Sprigiddy-dig-dig-dig, it still looks a bit small on 1024x768. How long is it now from left to right?
“NOTHING IS TRUE. EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED.”
                William S. Burroughs

“Who needs girls when you’ve got comics?”
                Grant Morrison’s Flex Mentallo

The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers

  • Administrator
  • Level 96
  • *****
  • Posts: 19211
  • Fell Points: 17
  • monkeys? yes.
    • View Profile
    • herb's world
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #95 on: July 18, 2004, 07:26:52 PM »
well my laptop can ONLY go to 800x600. But the site looks good on it.  

Spriggan

  • Administrator
  • Level 78
  • *****
  • Posts: 10582
  • Fell Points: 31
  • Yes, I am this awesome
    • View Profile
    • Legacies Lost
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #96 on: July 19, 2004, 02:42:50 AM »
it's about 600 px from left to right.  We;ll be useing the right hand side but since that's the side that gets cut on the low res you'll probaly only see advertisments and such there.

And again I think it just comes down to personal prefrence weather or not its too small on 1024x768.  But it is good to know some one thinks it's too small, but I don't think 42 has any plans on makeing anything larger.
Screw it, I'm buying crayons and paper. I can imagineer my own adventures! Wheeee!

Chuck Norris is the reason Waldo is hiding.


42

  • RPG Editors
  • Level 56
  • *
  • Posts: 4350
  • Fell Points: 8
  • Unofficial World Saver
    • View Profile
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #97 on: July 19, 2004, 02:57:46 AM »
Small is trendy right now in design.
The Folly of youth is to think that intelligence is a subsitute for experience. The folly of age is to think that experience is a subsitute for intelligence.

Spriggan

  • Administrator
  • Level 78
  • *****
  • Posts: 10582
  • Fell Points: 31
  • Yes, I am this awesome
    • View Profile
    • Legacies Lost
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #98 on: July 19, 2004, 05:34:17 AM »
so are monkeys
Screw it, I'm buying crayons and paper. I can imagineer my own adventures! Wheeee!

Chuck Norris is the reason Waldo is hiding.


Gemm: Rock & Roll Star; Born to Rock

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4591
  • Fell Points: 0
  • I Am Your Worst Nightmare's Dream
    • View Profile
    • Perfect
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #99 on: July 19, 2004, 07:30:51 AM »
Aren't there "fit to screen" things nowadays? That seems to be what the TWG pages do.

I like how you threw that word in there 42. Trendy.
“NOTHING IS TRUE. EVERYTHING IS PERMITTED.”
                William S. Burroughs

“Who needs girls when you’ve got comics?”
                Grant Morrison’s Flex Mentallo

The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers

  • Administrator
  • Level 96
  • *****
  • Posts: 19211
  • Fell Points: 17
  • monkeys? yes.
    • View Profile
    • herb's world
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #100 on: July 19, 2004, 07:41:12 AM »
yes, things will naturally stretch to fit if you specify their width as a percentage or don't specify the width. However, this doesn't alway slook good with the graphics. For example, the banner on the forum. the table with all the "heading" information stretches, but it's really ugly with the banner not stretching. Because graphics DON'T stretch, and would generally look bad if they do. So instead of that problem, one solution is just to decide how much of the screen they'll use and stick to that, defining it in terms of pixels. That way it always looks the same. In addition, when the text fills up that much space, you have very long lines. It gets more difficult to move to the correct line after finishing one, and imo, looks tacky
And then some whiney brat who doesn't realize that the whole point of having high resolution display is so you can see multiple windows at the same time comes along and wonders why the display on your website isn't a thousand pixels wide.

Spriggan

  • Administrator
  • Level 78
  • *****
  • Posts: 10582
  • Fell Points: 31
  • Yes, I am this awesome
    • View Profile
    • Legacies Lost
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #101 on: July 19, 2004, 08:23:58 AM »
Ya, pretty much what SE said.

Streach to fit realy only works with low graphics sites, thats why it works with TWG.  Besides the banner we don't use graphics to define or seperate different parts of the page.  The way the BS.com is set up streching to fix would ruin it.  The box that the blurbs are in is 3 different graphics that have a set width.  The headder graphic is actualy about 10 differnt ones the side bars are all different too.

I could make a different site for each of the 3 different resolutions useing Javescript to determing the resolution then directing the user to the correct page.  But that would intail makeing 3 different sets of each graphic as well as a bunch of code changes.  It's realy not worth all that extra work.  Heck, I cannot even think of a site that does that even though it's been avalible for several years now.
Screw it, I'm buying crayons and paper. I can imagineer my own adventures! Wheeee!

Chuck Norris is the reason Waldo is hiding.


EUOL

  • Moderator
  • Level 58
  • *
  • Posts: 4708
  • Fell Points: 33
  • Mr. Prolific [tm]
    • View Profile
    • Brandon Sanderson dot com
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #102 on: July 19, 2004, 06:54:50 PM »
Sprig:

I like the text off-white color.

That deep red for the bolds and poster names looks a bit off, but I don't know why.  What does 42 think?

The blog page looks great.
http://www.BrandonSanderson.com

"Technically, I don't even have a brain."--Fellfrosch

42

  • RPG Editors
  • Level 56
  • *
  • Posts: 4350
  • Fell Points: 8
  • Unofficial World Saver
    • View Profile
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #103 on: July 19, 2004, 09:40:12 PM »
I would say that the deep red as text just doesn't work. It doesn't provide enough contrast to make it easier to read. Try a light gray, like F4F4F4.
The Folly of youth is to think that intelligence is a subsitute for experience. The folly of age is to think that experience is a subsitute for intelligence.

EUOL

  • Moderator
  • Level 58
  • *
  • Posts: 4708
  • Fell Points: 33
  • Mr. Prolific [tm]
    • View Profile
    • Brandon Sanderson dot com
Re: BrandonSanderson.com
« Reply #104 on: July 20, 2004, 12:39:35 AM »
Can I take you out to lunch sometime this week to talk maps, 42?
http://www.BrandonSanderson.com

"Technically, I don't even have a brain."--Fellfrosch