Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Eerongal

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 80
76
Brandon Sanderson / Re: Favourite Minor Character
« on: September 17, 2010, 02:58:35 PM »
For me it is Axies the Collector. Anyone who gets completely drunk just to do a bit of mythbusting has my vote. Seriously though, I hope we see more of him.

Oh man, I loved the little bit we saw of that guy. I wanna know what's up with him, and why he apparently is indestructible.

77
Brandon Sanderson / Re: Theory: The Tranquiline Halls
« on: September 16, 2010, 02:25:15 PM »
I believe that the shard from Warbreaker (i dont remember what the name of the planet) is Endowment, while the shards from Sel (planet Elantris is set on) are Skai and Aona.

Skai and Aona are the shardholders on sel, not the shards themselves. Similar to how Ati and leras held ruin and preservation. Currently, we dont know what shards Skai and Aona held, i dont think.

78
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 16, 2010, 05:36:15 AM »
The part that bothers me now is the distance between the crew and the Parshendi shooting at them. From 20 feet away, I don't know how any bridgeman lives through a single charge that isn't fully supported by covering fire.
Maybe the Parshendi have really bad eyesight? Or they're facing the sun?

Nah, they probably have rambo-kinson disease. You know, how the good guy can just stand there and fire away at a huge enemy force and never be hit once?
Example :P

79
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 16, 2010, 12:31:24 AM »
Quote from: Eerongal

I cant honestly see a 30 foot long bridge weighing a mere 2000 pounds able to hold so much weight, however, as established, it cannot possibly weigh more than this for carrying purposes.)

Depends on the materials and how its constructed. I've seen some ridiculously light structures (usually bamboo) hold quite a lot of weight. I'm willing to buy that if the wood is tough and strong and light, then it could work.

Just to throw an additional wrench in the works, Brandon has stated in interviews and such that gravity on Roshar is lower than Earth-normal (0.7 or 0.6, I think?), which does have some effect on all calculations.

I love that you guys are putting this much thought into it. Whether the math works out easily or not, it's fun to see readers get involved to this degree.

Actually, that does throw a significant monkey wrench into the works.

Obviously, weight will be reduce to about 70% of what they were.

Also, objects would fall slower, meaning more time to push the bridges over the edge, obviously requiring less weighting.

With this snippet of info, i see no reason why it wouldnt work, and without weighting at the back, honestly.

80
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 15, 2010, 10:53:53 PM »
Properly crossbraced, it should be possible. Still, if you are right and it is indeed some 2000 pounds, it would still be manageable up to about 25 feet by a group of 10-15 men. The weight can't be greater than 100 pounds per person for 25 carriers, or it would never get to the battlefield. So my original upper estimate of 1500-1650 still stands as the heaviest feasible weight, with some 1250-1350 more likely.

Actually, now that you mention it, you're right, it couldn't possibly be more than 100 pounds per person for it to realistically carry it. However, a bridge that size with that weight restriction, i couldnt see it being reinforced enough to support cavalry. I'm honestly really starting to doubt the physics behind it as being possible.

bear with me here, this is just off the cuff, but wikipedia concerning horses in war, back in ancient times a "Light" war horse was anywhere from 800-1000 pounds. However, for it to use an armored rider (im pretty sure it mentioned his cavalry was armored, right), at least a medium horse is required, which weighs in about 1000-1200 pounds. Add in an armored rider, and we're looking at 1300-1700 or so pounds for a SINGLE cavalry man (200-300 or so for the man, and 100-200 for the armor).

Obviously, for a cavalry charge, we're going to have more than one cavalry man on the bridge, and they wont be moving single file. Realisticly, i would bet they're either moving double or triple file, considering the bridge width of 8 feet (beyond that, its going to get very crowded very fast)

So likely scenario, cavalry will be charging in double file. that's anywhere from 2600-3400 pounds on the bridge at any given moment.

To put that in perspective, a 2001 Nissan Altima weighs about 2945 pounds (so sayeth a quick google search)

So per rank of cavalry man, we're looking at the weight of a good-sized sedan or more depending on what file they use.

This is going to utterly crush your average pedestrian walking bridge (which earlier i estimated at about 4-6" in thickness for the walking part).

I cant honestly see a 30 foot long bridge weighing a mere 2000 pounds able to hold so much weight, however, as established, it cannot possibly weigh more than this for carrying purposes.

I just can't see these numbers working themselves out.

Honestly, i think this is just going to have to be one of those issues where we just agree that suspension of disbelief takes over, and we just assume "it works", because the author said so (i'm sure brandon didnt do terribly much research into the mechanics of it, and just wrote it as is because its a believable situation at face-value)

81
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 15, 2010, 10:18:47 PM »
That's assuming they use modern weighted thicknesses and planks. With proper supports, you could make the wood relatively thin, even the crossbeams. 1250-1500 could easily be the weight of the bridge.
Yes, Rosharan wood is likely heavier. But if it is denser, it is also likely stronger, so it doesn't have to be nearly so thick, leaving the weight roughly the same. Of course, even if it were heavier, just add more people to the end. That equals more weight at the end, making the bridge effective over long chasms. 

I'm pretty sure using a 2X4 like i was saying (with 4 inches long ways) is all ready incredibly thin for the walking area of a bridge that's 8 feet wide. Regardless of how dense it is, over the length of 8 feet, it'll make it have a lot of give if its thinner.

I know most of the pedestrian bridges in my area use planks a good 4-6" thick on the walking plane on a bridge thats about 4 or 5 foot wide. (at least the ones i played under as a kid did) I'm not saying this is the most efficient bridges ever, but im pretty sure the 2" i gave on the 2x4 would have to probably be a very low minimum thickness to even be possible.

Edit: especially when you consider the fact that mounted cavalry will be charging over it.

82
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 15, 2010, 09:45:40 PM »
speaking of "using the lightest wood available", i'd bet dimes-to-dollars that wood in roshar is heavier than just about all wood here. Because the weight of wood depends on the moisture in the environment, and roshar is a very moist climate.

Anywho, like i said before, it would be about 30 pounds per foot of just the walking area of the bridge. This is 900 pounds for the part you walk on alone. This includes none of the supporting structure  nor anything connecting this wood together. 350 pounds of building and structural support is very little on a 30 foot length of wood if you ask me.

83
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 15, 2010, 09:19:34 PM »
If it's weighted by anythign other than bridgemen they can't pull it accross after crossing it, of course this doesn't matter for the tower(or any other battle plateau), where they're crossing to fight then crossing back, but for the intermediate plateaus where they need to cross onto the plateau and cross a different gorge off of the plateau ahving the bridge weighted to enable them to cross would mean they couldn't then pull it accross. Unless it's just weighted by the bridge men, remember though, that a wooden bidge that's 30 foot by 8 foot would be pretty heavy, would 20-30 men be enough to weight it? Especially with only 5 feet to weight it in (if they're crossing a 25 foot gorge, just before the bridge reaches the other side it would ahve a mere 5 feet left on the near side, I guess 5 foot by 8 foot is a large-ish area...)

Well, an 8 foot long 2x4 weighs about 10 pounds. So that would lead us to presume the part people walk across (to say nothing of the rest of the bridge) would weigh at least 30 pounds on its own per foot. Then we have to figure in all the wood connectors, and and bracing that goes into building a bridge. That's going to get very heavy, very quickly.

84
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 15, 2010, 08:43:28 PM »
Ermm... They would be able to push a 30 foot bridge over a 25 foot chasm because it is weighted. By the Bridgemen.  :o It would be a simple, even a necessary matter to push down slightly while pushing the bridge over the chasm. This pushing down would keep it sticking out horizontally. Of course, if many bridgemen died the bridge would topple over the edge, but I suspect that that wouldn't be too much of an issue. (The bridges could be replaced with new ones)
To prove my theory, with one hand push a hardcover book to the edge of a table. See how far you can push it without it tipping over, while only using one hand. (Don't grab it.)
You'll be able to get surprisingly far! (Please don't use, WOK, not only is it far too thick for an accurate comparison, the risk of damage to said great tome is too great.)   ;)

Except that every foot or so is going to be literally hundreds of pounds of weight added opposing the bridgemen holding on to it. an 8 foot wide bridge is going to be heavy per foot of it. Plus, as they push it forward, less people are able to help, because there's less room for holding on to.

85
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 15, 2010, 07:31:16 PM »
A bit of a jump back in the conversation, but I recall we were discussing bridges being 50 feet long, When Kaladin first sees a bridge on page 101 it is said to be around 30 feet long.

Well, considering inkthinker was talking about the longest gaps they'd be seeing at 25 feet, this doesnt really hinder too much. In fact, it makes it a bit easier in the bridges not being so unwieldy.
But they wouldn't be able to push a 30 foot bridge out accross a gap 25 feet without it toppling, not easily anyway...

Oh, right, i fogot about that issue we were talking about. Yeah, i guess they would have to be weighted somehow.

86
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 15, 2010, 06:02:38 PM »
A bit of a jump back in the conversation, but I recall we were discussing bridges being 50 feet long, When Kaladin first sees a bridge on page 101 it is said to be around 30 feet long.

Well, considering inkthinker was talking about the longest gaps they'd be seeing at 25 feet, this doesnt really hinder too much. In fact, it makes it a bit easier in the bridges not being so unwieldy.

87
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 14, 2010, 08:47:34 PM »
In the end, it's cheaper to Soulcast rocks into food and use manual labor to make bridges than it is to Soulcast air into bridges and use manual labor to transport food to the warcamps.

But the wood for the bridges is being created by soulcasting, as pretty much explicitly stated in the book. :P

This is where the conundrum lies, which is why i say there has to be some quirk with soulcasting we arent aware of, i.e. bridge from nothing is more costly, timely, or impossible for this or that reason.

I'm nearly positive there is mention of nearby sources for wood. I'll have to re-read to find it for sure, but I though for sure there was something mentioned, either as Kaladin was coming in to the camps or while he was wandering about.

For some reason I thought it was stumpweight trees (though they may not be mentioned by name), but maybe that's 'cause when he described those I thought, "these are perfect for lumber" and I made a connection that isn't there.

Just the same, I'm pretty sure they're not getting all their wood through soulcasting.
It was said at one point that Sadeas held more lumber resources than any other Highprince (and that other Highprinces would try to make deals for that lumber), indicating they all used lumber for one thing or another.

Actually, it was talk about sadeas owning the most lumber, but he was also inflating his price so that the high princes would rely on the king's soulcasaters for wood. :P

It was at the same point that Dalinar said he would proclaim that all those who were caught up on their dues would get a discount on soulcasting, because people were behind on their payments.

88
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 14, 2010, 07:16:26 PM »
They're not limited to conventional building techniques. Maybe Soulcasting is slow, maybe it's hard to do. But we've seen no indication that they've even tried.

But we also haven't seen any indication that they HAVEN'T tried it. As the late Carl Sagan said "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

89
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 14, 2010, 05:55:13 PM »
Or what about the interlude chapter (don't have my book with me... ) dealing with the traders.  There is definitely mention in there about turning wood into metal... and that they wouldn't make a complex structre out of metal, but would carve it out of wood and then soulcast it into metal.

Why not build the wooden bridges, carry them into place, THEN soulcast them into metal?  A metal bridge would be stronger than a stone bridge, heavier than a wooden bridge, able to withstand the elements, and impossible to burn.  Granted, they could possibly still push them off the edge, but depending on how heavy the metal is, that may not be possible either and would require a LARGE group of Parshendi that the scouts would notice in time to prevent.

Best of both worlds?

I can understand why they didnt do this. Cost. They would have to create the wood, pay the carpenters to build bridges, and then pay the soulcasters to transmute it, the last probably seemed like it was more expensive than it was worth.

Plus, Sadea's bridge crews were considered way more than fast enough, so this could also be the reason they didn't do it. However, for Dalinar, i could see him considering it, since his siege bridges were so slow.

If your car runs perfectly fine, you dont usually consider getting a new car (unless you're rich and wanna show off, but thats a different scenario from the bridge crews)

90
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 14, 2010, 04:28:47 PM »
In the end, it's cheaper to Soulcast rocks into food and use manual labor to make bridges than it is to Soulcast air into bridges and use manual labor to transport food to the warcamps.

But the wood for the bridges is being created by soulcasting, as pretty much explicitly stated in the book. :P

This is where the conundrum lies, which is why i say there has to be some quirk with soulcasting we arent aware of, i.e. bridge from nothing is more costly, timely, or impossible for this or that reason.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 80