Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - DarkEnigma

Pages: [1]
1
Brandon Sanderson / Awakening: Immoral Practice?
« on: July 14, 2010, 07:28:14 PM »
I recently finished Warbreaker and though I didn't think it was as strong as Mistborn (after reading about Allomancy, Awakening is rather ho-hum by comparison) I was struck by a philosophical notion:

Vivenna might have been prissy and naive towards the beginning of the story, but she was right about one thing: collecting the Breath of others, and by extension Awakening, is a morally bankrupt practice.

It is difficult to objectively analyze this issue because Sanderson doesn't tell us very much about the long-term effects of becoming a Drab but here are a few conclusions I was able to draw:

The consequences of losing one's Breath include, reduced life-expectancy, reduced resistance to sickness and disease, increased vulnerability to being snuck up on, increased predisposition to depression or melancholy, and general lack of joie de vive.

I belive that selling one's Breath is sort of like selling a kidney, or perhaps prostituting oneself: no, it isn't fatal but the physiological and psycological impact is life-long, far-reaching, and hard to quantify.  Even if a person isn't coerced into doing so, taking advantage of anothers destitution in this way seems at best callous and at worst downright vampiric.  These issues are, of course, greatly exacerbated when children are the victim. 

Given all this, I see Awakeners and Gods as similar to people who buy products made from sweat shops: they might not be directly responsible in taking advantage of others but their patronage enables the practice to flourish.  This makes Vivenna's descision at the end to embrace Awakening somewhat baffling.

Thoughts? Rebuttals?

2
Brandon Sanderson / Deus-Ex Machina in Hero of Ages? *Spoilers*
« on: June 28, 2010, 10:07:05 PM »
Hello all,

I've always had a problem with writers who bend the rules they themselves set up or change a character's... erm... character in order to reach the next plot "checkpoint".  In lesser author's books I usually just roll my eyes and brush it off, but after reading the first two of the Mistborn trilogy and being delighted with the authors skill, I was quite put out when I came across this nefarious device in the third book.

To wit:  when Vin is trapped by Yomen in the cache, and is offered the drugged wine... and she drinks it.

I was sorely disappointed by this naked plot device: not only because it was unnecessary but mostly because it marred an otherwise skillfully rendered story (like a Ferrari with a sticky clutch... you might expect that from Ford). 

Let's recap: Vin is a woman whose survival instinct is second to none.  She stands apart and assesses the danger in every situation even when among friends.  Vin a child of the unforgiving streets, who is always the cynic, the overly cautious one, the consummate survivor... willingly allowing herself to be incapacitated?? Especially when there were obvious options still available for her to take (like torturing Telden with a hand over his mouth to dampen his screams until he gave the signal to open the grate)??  Don't tell me she isn't ruthless enough to attempt it: I submit the massacre at Cett's keep as exhibit "A".

This event was so jarring that I put down the book and walked away in mid sentence, I almost didn't finish the series.  Only several days later did I come back to it, more out of a sense of obligation than desire.

Was anyone else bothered by this, or am I just mad?

Pages: [1]