I don't mind further investigation. I would invite it. If the government has given a true account, then there should be *no* problem with further investigation. This is also how I felt about the whole UAE ports deal. I think it sends a horrible message to our allies that Congress would stonewall a deal simply because of nationality of the other partner happens to be geographically close to an enemy. However, if they're so squeeky clean, what did Bush have against a Congressional investigation? Sometimes I wonder if the rest of the world is retarded and I'm the only one with a brain.
Anyway, so yeah, something like the September 11 attacks is exceedingly difficult to account for completely. We will never be certain about everything, but that's all the more reason to look at it closer. As a current trial in Alexandria is showing, there was a god-awful amount of governmental incompetence regarding things that went on. One FBI agent sent a report to 17 major FBI officials outlining exactly the scenario that occurred, 2 months before the attacks. Nothing was done. Why? I suppose it *could* be a conspiracy, but Occam's razor, to me, seems to indicate fat lazy bastards in positions of authority.
So, further investigation is warranted. However, it pisses me off that because there are unclear facets people automatically assume this means the president got several people to engineer dark deeds against our own people, and somehow managed to remove any trace of a paper trail, and that you could get everyone who worked on the Pentagon after the attack to be absolutely silent about the fact that they never saw Airplane fuselage. I mean, what? How is any of that *possible?* let alone more likely than government incompetance (which we know is rampant) and some resourceful attacks from terrorists (who we *know* hate us).
meh. Sorry. Bad mood today.