That... is a very rude way to bump a thread.
This forum has a fairly small number of active posters. I imagine quite a few of them came in, read your post, saw how extremely specific it is about one minor issue, decided to let someone else respond, and forgot about it. With the small number of posters here, it is not very surprising to me that all of them did that, or just saw the title, misinterpreted it, and decided not to read a probably mistaken "proof" of some unidentified crackpot theory. When I see the word "proof", checking a written document for errors is not the first thing that comes to mind. Try some variation of "proofread" instead.
When a post goes unanswered for several days, the appropriate thing to do is to post a polite reply to bring attention to it and inform everyone that "someone else" never did respond, not insult the entire forum.
As for your original post, my reading of that scene is that it is written from the perspective of a third person omniscient narrator, not from Sazed's point of view. Sazed may not see the blink through the bandage, but the narrator does. I agree it is not entirely clear, however, and might benefit from a little editing.
