Author Topic: Animal Face-Off  (Read 1482 times)

42

  • Staff
  • Level 56
  • *
  • Posts: 4350
  • Fell Points: 8
  • Unofficial World Saver
    • View Profile
Animal Face-Off
« on: April 12, 2004, 01:28:07 AM »
So I've started watching this on Discovery Channel. It's kind of like virtual boxing with animals. I think they should make a videa game version of this show where you could select different animals and try them out against each other.
The Folly of youth is to think that intelligence is a subsitute for experience. The folly of age is to think that experience is a subsitute for intelligence.

The Holy Saint, Grand High Poobah, Master of Monkeys, Ehlers

  • Administrator
  • Level 96
  • *****
  • Posts: 19211
  • Fell Points: 17
  • monkeys? yes.
    • View Profile
    • herb's world
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2004, 07:31:53 AM »
as long as it's not Animal Face/Off

Spriggan

  • Administrator
  • Level 78
  • *****
  • Posts: 10582
  • Fell Points: 31
  • Yes, I am this awesome
    • View Profile
    • Legacies Lost
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2004, 07:45:28 AM »
Face/off was a good mindless movie, and it would be even better if you relpaced Travolta and Cage with a shark and crocidile.
Screw it, I'm buying crayons and paper. I can imagineer my own adventures! Wheeee!

Chuck Norris is the reason Waldo is hiding.


EUOL

  • Moderator
  • Level 58
  • *****
  • Posts: 4708
  • Fell Points: 33
  • Mr. Prolific [tm]
    • View Profile
    • Brandon Sanderson dot com
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2004, 07:46:37 AM »
Or JP and a Koala.
http://www.BrandonSanderson.com

"Technically, I don't even have a brain."--Fellfrosch

Spriggan

  • Administrator
  • Level 78
  • *****
  • Posts: 10582
  • Fell Points: 31
  • Yes, I am this awesome
    • View Profile
    • Legacies Lost
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2004, 08:24:34 AM »
Or Entropy and Gemm.
Screw it, I'm buying crayons and paper. I can imagineer my own adventures! Wheeee!

Chuck Norris is the reason Waldo is hiding.


Mad Dr Jeffe

  • Level 74
  • *
  • Posts: 9162
  • Fell Points: 7
  • Devils Advocate General
    • View Profile
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2004, 08:30:08 AM »
Or Spriggan and Me!
Its an automated robot. Based on Science!

Entsuropi

  • Level 60
  • *
  • Posts: 5033
  • Fell Points: 0
  • =^_^= Captain of the highschool Daydreaming team
    • View Profile
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2004, 08:40:09 AM »
Quote
Or Entropy and Gemm.


o_0
If you're ever in an argument and Entropy winds up looking staid and temperate in comparison, it might be time to cut your losses and start a new thread about something else :)

Fellfrosch

fuzzyoctopus

  • Level 57
  • *
  • Posts: 4556
  • Fell Points: 0
  • fearsome and furry
    • View Profile
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2004, 10:06:02 AM »
Quote
So I've started watching this on Discovery Channel. It's kind of like virtual boxing with animals. I think they should make a videa game version of this show where you could select different animals and try them out against each other.


I watched one episode, Lion vs. Tiger I think, and it was... *shrug*.  I mean, sure it's kind of cool, but it's like, "Hey, unemployed computer animaters who are really bored and are getting paid to screw around with animals."

No one on the show is memorable or particularly funny, and that's what really makes these kinds of shows for me.  Like on MythBusters, the two guys are really funny guys.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2004, 10:06:47 AM by fuzzyoctopus »
"Hr hr! dwn wth vwls!" - Spriggan

I reject your reality, and substitute my own. - Adam Savage, Mythbusters

French is a language meant to be butchered, especially by drunk Scotts. - Spriggan

42

  • Staff
  • Level 56
  • *
  • Posts: 4350
  • Fell Points: 8
  • Unofficial World Saver
    • View Profile
Re: Animal Face-Off
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2004, 01:55:47 PM »
Yes, but I like all the useless stats that they throw around.
The Folly of youth is to think that intelligence is a subsitute for experience. The folly of age is to think that experience is a subsitute for intelligence.