Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sdelu

Pages: [1] 2
1
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Shalan - near end of book **SPOILERS**
« on: September 10, 2010, 11:41:47 PM »
Well, if she killed him before the Blade was summoned, would it automatically summon itself? I'm under the assumption that Shardblades don't disappear if you kill their bearer while they're not summoned, but I can't remember if we've seen a Shardbearer killed while his Blade was unsummoned.

Gavilar's blade was unsummoned when he died, and appeared next to him shortly after.  So, yes, she could have gotten the blade after her father died even if he hadn't summoned it.

2
Brandon Sanderson / Re: Galivar: "The Parshendi? That makes no sense."
« on: September 09, 2010, 06:40:25 PM »
Even knowing that the Parshendi had hired the assassin, he handed over the orb or whatever and said 'Don't let them get this'. I assume he is referring to someone else because he wouldn't have mentioned it at all if he were worried about the Parshendi.

I would assume that if not the Parshmen, then the people he didn't want to get the orb were the people he THOUGHT were killing him.  Off the top of my head I don't really remember them (Thaikandar or something? Sadeas was one as well, no? Also, doesn't it seem really, really odd that Gavilar names Sadeas as a potential murderer when Sadeas is the man who pretended to be Gavilar?).  Members of the Ghostblood or whatever they were, perhaps?

Not to mention that Gavilar doesn't seem to have any problem with Szeth flying around and running on walls.  He just says that he was expecting him.  Was he literally expecting Szeth, or just any old assassin?  I mean, I'd be pretty surprised if I walked out with Plate and Blade--one of the deadliest men on the planet--and some dude running around on walls killed me. Also, we know Taravangian had knowledge of him and his abilities, so maybe Gavilar did as well.

More interesting, could Gavilar have been a member of the Ghostbloods or a similar organization? That could explain why he has a wonky glowing black sphere thing that he doesn't want other people to get....

And no, like many things right now it makes no sense that he would give Szeth the black orb and say "Don't let them get this" if he meant the Parshendi... but perhaps there is an explanation that WOULD make sense.

3
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WOK: Odium (Spoilers)
« on: September 09, 2010, 02:35:48 PM »
I find the manner of the Radiants' betrayal to be quite telling. They didn't just walk away—they made a statement. We will have nothing to do with you any more. Who lost honor, the Knights, or the rest of humanity?

I believe that vision happened after the Heralds called it quits. After "The Enemy" (probably Rayse/Odium) stopped sending his minions to cause desolations, for some unknown reason (perhaps to gather steam for the Final Desolation?). When we see the Knights, they fight smoke monsters and protect people. I get the impression the Knights didn't used to fight people. Yet, the comments of soldiers in Firestone Keep about them being needed on "the front lines" make me think the people had been using the Radiants to fight their wars, man against man, and that the Radiants got fed up with that.

What place does an organization founded on absolute honor for the purpose of protecting a united humanity against the forces of Odium have in a world where the Voidbringers rise up no longer? I don't think it was Odium's taint that drove the Radiants away. I think it was the absence thereof.

That's a good point.  I suppose if the Heralds convinced everyone that they had finally won, there would be no reason for the Knights Radiant to stand and fight wars between men. You're right--for an order founded to protect humankind, being forced to fight wars between men would certainly push them over the edge. And that fits right in with leaving the soldiers to kill each other over the Shards right after abandoning them.

But is that a big enough betrayal to cause the Knights Radiant to betray man in turn?  They could have just stopped fighting.  I think there was something bigger that caused it, something from the Almighty or the Heralds or the spren, not just from man.

4
Brandon Sanderson / Re: Dalinar's visions *SPOILERS*
« on: September 09, 2010, 02:20:43 PM »
For one, why did it choose Dalinar in particular, but no one else (as far as we know)? Almost no one would have been as receptive to the message in the way Dalinar has. He's a uniquely.. obsessive and honorable persion, who happens to be in a position of power that might be capable of 'uniting' people.

In one of the epigraphs (sorry, don't have the book on me to quote it) there is mention that one of the patients had been having visions of some sort for the past 2 years.  This was one of those collected by Taravangian.  So I'm not sure that Dalinar IS the only one receiving such visions, unless they're completely unrelated.

Either way, it seems like Dalinar is charged with the task of recreating the Knights Radiant.  I'm not sure that requires him to become a Surgebinder or even be bonded to a spren at all.  He could always be of one of the other orders, as well.

5
Brandon Sanderson / Re: Dalinar's visions *SPOILERS*
« on: September 09, 2010, 03:53:29 AM »
I took it as definately an effectively recorded message after the last vision.
Well, it was a vision sent by a deity - it was flexible - he could interact with people in it and change things that happened in the vision (though I highly doubt anything is actually being changed in the past), and the deity in question, while tending to repeat himself, DID respond to prompts, but simply said 'I can't tell you any more' in most cases - perhaps because it was still ultimately a message and a message can't give more information than it has been given.

I'm not so sure he had any ability to respond to Dalinar.  If you look at what the Almighty says and don't read Dalinar's questions, the thought process still makes sense.  I can see what Dalinar meant about misinterpreting his statements as responses; they do make sense either way.  So I tend to agree with the recording/journal slant.

The only problem with that, though, is how the heck can the Almighty put his hand on Dalinar's shoulder and look in his eyes?  Maybe it's just that he can't hear him?  Or was the ending something special, since Dalinar hadn't seen that part the first time around?

Too many questions! I hate good books! :p

6
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Kaladin and Syl *Spoilers*
« on: September 08, 2010, 09:42:32 PM »
The ones that we saw.

It's possible that the Surgebinding orders didn't use plate.

Actually, I think we know for a fact that they did.  In Dalinar's vision of the Radiants giving up their plate and blade:

Quote from: US hardcover p 729
"...the Order of the Stonewards, my lord," the still-mounted scout was saying. "And a large number of Windrunners. All on foot."

We know that Windrunners are Surgebinders, and we know they were there to give up their Shard and Plate, so I think it's safe to say Surgebinders could use Shardplate.  Plus, the ones from Dalinar's other visions falling from the sky, those seem to be the work of the Lashings, no?  And when they hit the ground they have that "pulse" of Stormlight, just like Kaladin when he fell from tying the armor to the bridge.

7
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 08, 2010, 09:31:20 PM »
sdelu: you missed what inkthinkr said, crossing from plateau A to plateau B you find a spot where A is higher than B, going back you find a spot where B is higher than A as they're not at all even.

No, I understand that.  But out of all those plateaus, it's really going to be that convenient?

As I said, I don't really care if it makes sense or not.  There's an explanation and I can certainly "suspend my disbelief" that everything works out so cleanly, but I was now just thinking of the implications this could have on the story.

What IF an army got stuck out on the plains, much like Dalinar almost did?  What if they couldn't get back to their camp, but had to go through another?  See, it could be used in some way, some how.  Maybe one of the highprinces will be stuck and they won't save them from the Parshendi without an alliance, yada yada.

So I'm not just thinking in terms of "is this possible" as much as "what would this mean"?  And I find the possibilities interesting!

8
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WOK: Odium (Spoilers)
« on: September 08, 2010, 09:26:32 PM »
That's possible.  But really, there is some sense of a great betrayal.  What could that be?

Could that simply be the Almighty dying,  or maybe the betrayal was the tainting of the Shards? (assuming they ARE tainted at all, and Kaladin and Syl's distrust of them is not just a red herring.  I mean, it's possible that Syl just inherited Kaladin's dislike of them, isn't it?).  They could have been losing their magic, or they could have discovered the same disgust at slaughtering people that Dalinar begins to feel.

There are lots of reasons for it, but I don't think that the Knights Radiant betrayed mankind before they were somehow betrayed (or led to feel betrayed) in turn.

9
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 08, 2010, 09:21:36 PM »
It's not so much that there's a "downhill" both up and back, but rather that the plateaus are not at all level with each other, meaning that adjacent plateaus may each have higher and lower points. You don't cross over at the same place each way. One reason that Sadeas's bridge crews are faster and more effective than Dalinar's mobile bridge towers is that it's easier to direct 25 men carrying a 40-50' bridge over rough terrain than to tow bridge towers in relays.


I understand that, but then they wouldn't be able to arrive exactly back in Sadeas' camp every time, or at least it doesn't make much sense. 

- If they leave over Plateau A and want to get to Plateau B, then logically Plateau A will be higher than B.
- To get to Plateau C, B will have to be higher than C
- To progress, they would always have to find a lower plateau.
- Eventually, they have to come back to platform A, or some other Plateau, which will be higher than any Plateau around it, since the path they take gets continually lower and lower.  They literally cannot keep finding plateaus that go continually lower and expect to wind all the way up at the camp again.

Wouldn't they eventually come to a point where they would HAVE to go upward?  Unless you're going to say "well the land is just so uneven that there's always a way to go down that will lead to a way up" or "there are some plateaus that have a low end and a high end."  Which I can buy, but just how many?

But then, this conundrum can be oh-so-easily explained by the permanent Bridges, couldn't it? :)

Still, I think there would  come a point where it would be impossible to reach certain plateaus or return to certain camps.  Interesting thought.

10
Brandon Sanderson / Re: *WoK Spoilers* The Almighty?
« on: September 08, 2010, 08:59:28 PM »
I'm not as familiar with the cosmere stuff as the rest of you, but just from this alone...

Quote from: US hardcover p 648
Child of Tanavast.  Child of Honor.  Child of one long since departed.  The sudden voice shook Kaladin; he floundered in the air.
   The Oathpact was shattered.

Could Tanavast be the name of the Almighty?  Or at least one of the shards/shardholder dudes?  Or is Tanavast something in-world?

I mean, "child of one long since departed."  We know the Almighty is (likely) dead and that he made humans on Roshar, and we don't know for how long he has been departed... but considering the most recent vision we get to see from Dalinar is the day of Recreance, that would certainly be a long time ago.

So then, "Child of Tanavast" and "Child of one long since departed" could be the same? And could the Almighty be "Honor"?

Or maybe Tanavast held the shard named Honor, and that's where Kaladin's magic (and maybe the Nahel bond) comes from?

I feel like there's something big in those lines, I'm just not sure if I'm looking in the right direction.


Edit -- More likely, perhaps Tanavast is one of the Heralds?  The Herald of Honor?  That might make more sense, considering the talk of the Oathpact.

11
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WOK: Odium (Spoilers)
« on: September 08, 2010, 08:45:02 PM »
It does make a certain amount of sense that it is somehow linked to the Highstorms.

The only problem I have with Odium being in "control" of the Highstorms is the...face...telling Kaladin that "Odium reigns."  Now unless the face man is somehow trapped within the Highstorms or something.... But either way, they're getting stronger, and there's something to them for sure.

(I wonder if there's anything to the whole Jezrien/Stormfather connection)

As for the Shardblades/Shardplates, well, there does seem to be something about them. Maybe without the glyphs or without Stormlight they can't be properly wielded?

I had a thought that maybe the Knights Radiant "betrayed" mankind because they were abandoned by their spren (assuming that spren are 100% necessary for magic).  One of the epigraphs (pg 48) states:

Quote
"Ten orders.  We were loved, once.  Why have you forsaken us, Almighty!  Shard of my soul, where have you gone?"

I'm almost leaning towards the "shard of my soul" being the spren.  Considering that they form a bond, with human and spren almost becoming as one, and the spren are (if i remember) explained almost as being the souls of things...hm.   We know that Syl and (presumably) other spren dislike the Shardblades, and we know that Dalinar felt a great sense of loss and betrayal when the Radiants gave up their shards.

Of course, this could have been when the Almighty was slain as well, and somehow Odium tainted the shards with his death.  I mean, we don't get any visions of events after the Recreance, save the Almighty's prediction, so maybe they felt his power wane?

Maybe some combination of both?  Either way, Odium had to have been involved here somehow...

12
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: Bridge Crews & Bridges
« on: September 08, 2010, 08:28:42 PM »
It is impossible to get onto a plateau that's higher than your current one. When they're crossing, they pick a spot that's lower on the other side. The bridges are somewhat over 40' long.

I guess the only problem with that would be that they would have to get back onto the higher levels on the way back.

I mean, they could just find an even lower plateau and go from there, but that seems really convenient that there's a path "downhill" there and a path "downhill" back...

Either way, I didn't have a problem with that at all.  I just took it for granted that it worked and didn't question the hows or whys of it.

13
Brandon Sanderson / WOK: Odium (Spoilers)
« on: September 08, 2010, 07:18:43 AM »
Something we see in Mistborn is that the shards (Preservation and Ruin) function according to their name.  Well, duh.  As such, it only makes sense that Odium would work in a similar way.  Thus, looking at the definition of odium we find:

o·di·um
–noun
1.
intense hatred or dislike, esp. toward a person or thing regarded as contemptible, despicable, or repugnant.
2.
the reproach, discredit, or opprobrium attaching to something hated or repugnant: He had to bear the odium of neglecting his family.
3.
the state or quality of being hated.

The first definition seems the most relevant to a story.  Thus,in order to find the influence of Odium on the current world of Roshar, we would have to find instances of hate or dislike.  And, in fact, the world of Roshar is riddled with it already.  As such, there is probably some merit in discussing the various hates/dislikes we have seen.

Here are some of the bigger ones I have noticed:

1) Darkeyes hate the Lighteyes, and vice versa.
2) Szeth begins to hate those he kills (does his shard have anything to do with this?)
3) Alethi get the "Thrill" which makes them revel in death and killing.  They seem to truly hate those they slaughter...
4) Many people dislike/hate the Parshmen  (not just the Parshendi)
5) The people hate the Radiants
6) The highprinces hate each other, and especially hate those who show signs of weakness

And who isn't hated?
Well... mostly Shardbearers, it seems.  Odd, that.

I'm not sure if there's really anything to these just yet, and half the list seems like a pretty weak correlation, but I have a feeling that Odium has his hands in many pies already.  I think the biggest one worth looking at is the Thrill, as we already have conflict between Dalinar and the Thrill. Also, the hate between lighteyes and darkeyes seems important, and certainly seems as if it is something that has been brought about recently (in Dalinar's visions it seems they are of equal rank).

Really, I'm just looking for a way to find out just what influence Odium has.  If "Odium reigns" then we should be able to find something, no?

Is it as simple as the strife between the Alethi and Parshendi, Taravangian and his "pals," and the Ghostblood (or whatever they're called)?

14
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WOK Spoilers: Parshmen
« on: September 08, 2010, 06:33:30 AM »

On when they run after Kaladin's lashing, it's possible they freak out because they pass down stories or legends about the radiants.

I agree.  But the question is, do they act from fear, honor, reverence?  At first they try to fight him, but then they just leave him be.  Out of respect for his skills?  Maybe.  But what's with the chant then?

If they were voidbringers and evil beings, why wouldn't they try and kill him right then and there?

The talking before death thing is because the Everdesolation or whatever (you know what I'm talking about, I hope) is about to come.

Yes.  But Taravangian (and likely Jasnah) will link the coming of these occurrences with the meeting with the Parshendi.  And likely they are linked... but in what way?  Does the meeting signify that a war will come, or is the clashing of the two cultures a form of weakening the people that would stand against the voidbringers, or is it because Gavilar found that stone (perhaps he stole it from them?), or is it just coincidence?

The fact that there is overwhelming evidence for the Parshendi/Parshmen being the voidbringers, and the fact that the meeting of the two coincide with the onset of the Everstorm... it just seems fishy.  Either there's some sort of major twist coming, or the Parshendi aren't the true threat of the voidbringers.  I mean, all that evidence in book one feels way too convenient to me.

what happened to parshendi surge binders?
wait how would parshendi surge binders even work, without the radiant ideals, did they also bind with spren?

Well, we don't really know what's going on with that. And again, that's assuming that the Parshendi are the voidbringers. Assuming that's correct (as it seems to be), then that would require the spren bonding with the Parshendi. I don't see that happening.  It's more likely that the abilities can manifest themselves without the spren, and the spren are necessary to either (a) enhance the powers or (b) bond the surgebinders to a cause.

It seemed like Parshendi were just Parshmen after they got set off.

I'm not sure what you mean by this.

assassinating Gavilar didn't help the unification effort at all
-if anything, they are acting perfectly to prevent unification, because if the highprinces were at home then Dalinar could be conquering and Elhokar could be taking over, versus on the plains they stayed in the state of disarray for 6 years.

Maybe.  But consider that Gavilar was the only one who believed in the Codes at the time.  He would not have lasted long as king (and he didn't, now did he?).  And Dalinar at the time thought that unity could come from conquering.  I could go on, but for now let me just say that no, I don't think there's really any chance that there would have been unity with Gavilar on the throne.  However, killing the new king and thus FORCING all the highprinces to go to war? Hm.

I'm not saying it makes much sense, I'm just trying to find a way to make the oddities of the Parshendi make some sort of sense.  They're definitely not what they seem, and it just feels too easy to label them as voidbringers.  I mean, the evidence is overwhelming, and I can't see how it's wrong at this point, but... I don't know. Sanderson is a tricky guy, and this smacks of trickery to me.

  -this was why I was thinking they could be acting from Odium's commands, intended to prevent the unification that might enable the Alethi to stand against the Everstorm. Of course, the honor thing still doesn't make sense.     

-why didn't the parshendi have Szeth come back to them after killing Gavilar? They just gave him up?

Neither of those actions make sense at all.  The honor makes no sense.  The Shardbearer raising his blade to Dalinar makes no sense.  Letting Szeth go makes no sense.  Killing Gavilar makes no sense.  Being so reverent of their dead when nothing else drives them to passion makes no sense.... What the heck, man?

we don't actually know what the parshendi shard bearer would have done with dalinar, having been interrupted, he might have been planning to question him, beat him up, etc. and then kill him.

Absolutely true.  But the way he speaks to Dalinar indicates that he was searching for him.  Why?  Just to kill him? To get some answers makes more sense.  But HOW would he know to look for Dalinar, and why?

Perhaps they know something of the message Szeth left, and needed Dalinar dead along with Gavilar.  Or perhaps it had something to do with his visions. 

the one thing that really doesn't seem to add up, though, is still the conflict between the Parshendi being honorable versus fighting on the side of the thunderclasts and the Almighty stepping in on the side of alethkar

It's all quite wonky, isn't it?  I don't buy the excuse that "Odium is bound by honor" or what-have-you.  If he just killed the Almighty, how the heck can he be bound by honor?

15
Brandon Sanderson / Re: WoK: The Heralds *Minor Spoilers*
« on: September 08, 2010, 02:19:01 AM »
Didn't Brandon explain a long time ago that there would be a viewpoint character who was an immortal breaking under the strain of saving the world (or some such thing?).  I think that sounds like it could very well be Taln....

As for the rest of the Heralds, well, I for one do not believe for a second that they are dead.

Well, there's going to be ten different viewpoint characters like Kaladin (though there may be a second Kaladin book). Dalinar and Shallan, obviously, will get books. Szeth will get a book (squee!). Even with a second Kaladin book, that's five out of ten Stormlight Archive novels. [Source: that interview Josh, Mi'ch, and I did with Brandon for 17th Shard, which, um, hasn't come live yet. Soon!]

Eh.  I'm not sure I'm very excited about that :(  10 viewpoint characters will eventually mean some are left out of the later books.

Pages: [1] 2