Timewaster's Guide Archive

General => Rants and Stuff => Topic started by: Crusader808 on February 20, 2009, 08:36:13 PM

Title: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on February 20, 2009, 08:36:13 PM
You've gotta be lookin at me because I just leveled.

Thats a new feat right? Do I have to wait until 4th level before I get a stat point?
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Eerongal on February 20, 2009, 10:09:54 PM
You've gotta be lookin at me because I just leveled.

Thats a new feat right? Do I have to wait until 4th level before I get a stat point?

you're level 2. So no, no feat for you.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on February 20, 2009, 10:22:24 PM
You've gotta be lookin at me because I just leveled.

Thats a new feat right? Do I have to wait until 4th level before I get a stat point?

you're level 2. So no, no feat for you.


Dang, we're still playing 3.x. Suckage.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Miyabi on February 20, 2009, 10:27:22 PM
Why don't we just go back ADD and use 2nd ed books with it. :D

-=Oh the nostalgia is thick now=-
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on February 20, 2009, 10:30:19 PM
Why don't we just go back ADD and use 2nd ed books with it. :D

-=Oh the nostalgia is thick now=-

Because if you reallllllly want nostalgia you'll bring back the old red box instead. In which case I call dibs on playing the Dwarf.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Eerongal on February 20, 2009, 10:34:21 PM
Why don't we just go back ADD and use 2nd ed books with it. :D

-=Oh the nostalgia is thick now=-

Because if you reallllllly want nostalgia you'll bring back the old red box instead. In which case I call dibs on playing the Dwarf.

dang :(
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on February 20, 2009, 10:43:55 PM
Why don't we just go back ADD and use 2nd ed books with it. :D

-=Oh the nostalgia is thick now=-

Because if you reallllllly want nostalgia you'll bring back the old red box instead. In which case I call dibs on playing the Dwarf.

dang :(


Look, if you really want the dwarf, I'll play the Elf.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Miyabi on February 20, 2009, 10:46:40 PM
Oh wow!
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on February 24, 2009, 12:37:58 AM
Quote
Look, if you really want the dwarf, I'll play the Elf.
Hmmm…somehow I don't see the 'Sexy, Shoeless God of War' playing the 'Elf.…' 8)
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on February 24, 2009, 05:14:14 AM
Quote
Look, if you really want the dwarf, I'll play the Elf.
Hmmm…somehow I don't see the 'Sexy, Shoeless God of War' playing the 'Elf.…' 8)

Yeah, but the halflings in that edition sucked. They weren't the feral gods of death that appeared in the later edition. Its the best of a bad lot.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Eerongal on February 24, 2009, 11:48:04 PM
off topic: Belkar = awesome.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on February 25, 2009, 12:00:46 AM
I feel lost… ??? ??? ???
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Andrew the Great on February 25, 2009, 04:56:32 AM
You're not alone, shaggy
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Chaos on February 25, 2009, 06:53:11 AM
Belkar is a halfling in a webcomic, The Order of the Stick. (Which, by the way, is an awesome webcomic. Check it out :P) "Sexy, Shoeless God of War" is a quote from him, describing himself.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on February 28, 2009, 10:24:14 PM
This thread should be locked and erased on charges of pointlessness.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Miyabi on March 01, 2009, 06:39:33 AM
This thread should be locked and erased on charges of pointlessness.
It's not pointless.

You are just WAY too young to understand what we're talking about. xD

EDIT: I mean that as in you weren't around when the Red Box was, not as in like a mean way.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on March 01, 2009, 07:36:15 AM
This thread should be locked and erased on charges of pointlessness.

Just because you don't get a joke doesn't make it pointless, even if it is pointless. Plus, it's in Rants. Rants need no point.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on March 01, 2009, 05:28:14 PM
Quote
Rants need no point.
Ummm…I don't know if I would agree with that.…
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Reaves on March 01, 2009, 05:39:34 PM
Hey Shaggy you are not alone. I haven't really been following this thread and don't really get what they are talking about either. Besides not every thread needs input from every member, if a thread doesn't interest you then just ignore it  ;)
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on March 02, 2009, 07:22:09 PM
Hey Shaggy you are not alone. I haven't really been following this thread and don't really get what they are talking about either. Besides not every thread needs input from every member, if a thread doesn't interest you then just ignore it  ;)

Words to live by. I don't post in threads that involve stuff I'm not into, because I won't be able to add anything constructive, things  like your goodbye post Shaggy. Constructive comments in random chatter threads (Like this one) means playing along. Not being a buzz-kill.

Just sayin.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Miyabi on March 02, 2009, 08:01:10 PM
Threads on TWG are supposed to have at least some substance. And I'm sorry, Crusader, but the first post that created this thread was rather lacking in that area. And ridiculous, too. No offense, but…level 2?? Come on. Saint Ehlers is a Level 96, and you expect to be honoured because you advanced ONE LEVEL?? My posts (in this topic) may not be constructive, but at least they have a point.…
The first post on this topic was an old role playing joke that a lot of us found funny Shaggy. 

I like you, but if you keep arguing on this topic other people will get angry at you, because from your side it's a losing battle.  We all found it funny and understand the joke. >>  Just letting you know.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on March 02, 2009, 08:01:29 PM
Threads on TWG are supposed to have at least some substance. And I'm sorry, Crusader, but the first post that created this thread was rather lacking in that area. And ridiculous, too. No offense, but…level 2?? Come on. Saint Ehlers is a Level 96, and you expect to be honoured because you advanced ONE LEVEL?? My posts (in this topic) may not be constructive, but at least they have a point.…

Dude, the rants area states "stupid jokes" and the like. This isn't about a male member measuring thing (your level means jack-all-squat), its about making a joke about a milestone and then incorporating a splash of gaming humour in it. You didn't get it, fine. You still don't get it and likely after this post you probably still won't quite get it.

Folks on RPGnet make cracks about reaching a 100 posts followed by the traditional posts from the 10k people of "Piker!"  Its about being jocular with other posters. The moment you start taking the internet too seriously you act like...well like how you're acting now.

Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on March 02, 2009, 11:04:05 PM
OK, my bad. I totally apologize. I didn't know it was a joke–as you have said, I am young for this forum, and so do not know what people are talking about sometimes. My mistake; I hope you all can accept my apology. And…just for the record…if you look at it from my point of view, I'm not so out of line, because I didn't know where the joke was coming from (or indeed, that it was a joke).
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on March 02, 2009, 11:10:18 PM
No sweat. I'll be posting something more mainstream shortly (zombies are mainstream right?)
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on March 02, 2009, 11:14:13 PM
OK, good.
Haha why not? 8)
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Miyabi on March 02, 2009, 11:21:10 PM
No sweat. I'll be posting something more mainstream shortly (zombies are mainstream right?)
Only if said zombies have successfully integrated themselves into a Jane Austin novel.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Eerongal on March 02, 2009, 11:23:17 PM
Everyone knows zombies are BRAINstream!
[/pun]
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on March 02, 2009, 11:24:55 PM
No sweat. I'll be posting something more mainstream shortly (zombies are mainstream right?)
Only if said zombies have successfully integrated themselves into a Jane Austin novel.

Fine! For the record though, victorian romance and zombies are a tired cliche.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Miyabi on March 02, 2009, 11:27:49 PM
Everyone knows zombies are BRAINstream!
[/pun]
ha ha ha.


@crusader - From what I hear it's making a comeback.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Eerongal on March 02, 2009, 11:28:20 PM
No sweat. I'll be posting something more mainstream shortly (zombies are mainstream right?)
Only if said zombies have successfully integrated themselves into a Jane Austin novel.

Fine! For the record though, victorian romance and zombies are a tired cliche.

Best. Cliche. EVER.

No debating this point is allowed. Any attempts will be met with "*Covers ears* I'M NOT LISTENING TO YOU!!"
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on March 02, 2009, 11:29:41 PM
If only Oliver Twist had zombies in it…now THAT would be cool.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on March 03, 2009, 12:16:28 AM
If only Oliver Twist had zombies in it…now THAT would be cool.

Yes it would have. Everything is better with zombies.

Even bad movies.

Batman and Robin? Lame!
Batman and Robin get eaten by zombies? AWESOME!
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Miyabi on March 03, 2009, 12:18:49 AM
All this talk of undead makes me think of the movie I watched last night.

Has anyone ever seen Stay Alive?
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on March 03, 2009, 12:25:38 AM
*People* + ZOMBIES [always = ] good movie
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Eerongal on March 06, 2009, 09:26:12 PM
No sweat. I'll be posting something more mainstream shortly (zombies are mainstream right?)
Only if said zombies have successfully integrated themselves into a Jane Austin novel.

Fine! For the record though, victorian romance and zombies are a tired cliche.
... (http://www.amazon.com/Pride-Prejudice-Zombies-Classic-Ultraviolent/dp/1594743347)

That is all (hint: it's a link!)

Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on March 06, 2009, 11:47:48 PM
WOW that is INTENSE!!!  :D ;D :D Haha how'd you find it?
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Crusader808 on March 07, 2009, 07:29:12 AM
This is freaking beautiful.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Peter Ahlstrom on March 07, 2009, 05:51:55 PM
We were talking about that here (http://www.timewastersguide.com/forum/index.php?topic=6481.0).
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Peter Ahlstrom on March 07, 2009, 08:37:53 PM
The book isn't out yet.
Title: Re: You lookin at me?
Post by: Shaggy on March 07, 2009, 09:04:18 PM
Hehe rite… :-[ :-[ :-[ *blushes madly*